Social Question

skittles's avatar

If you could live with one or the other, which would you choose? Science or art?

Asked by skittles (110points) October 18th, 2010

We see art everywhere, in literature, music, etc…Just life in general is full of art. Religion counts as a form of art doesnt it? From people’s arguments it surely is (stories, tales, mythology etc).
At the same time, science is everywhere. Biology, physics, chemistry etc.
If you could live without one of these, what would it be and why? What would the world be like then?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

20 Answers

MissA's avatar

Art…the expression of life would be my choice to keep.

WestRiverrat's avatar

Most of the great artists of the past were also the great scientists. I don’t think you can seperate one from the other. Best example is Leonardo da Vinci.

Aesthetic_Mess's avatar

Art. I couldn’t live without music. I’ve never gone a day without listening to it, or reading a book. I can deal without learning about biology, or horticulture, but I love art. Nature will always do it’s own thing, but art is all our own. But of course you can find art in nature too. See! art is everywhere, and it’s inescapable.
@WestRiverrat has a point too.

El_Cadejo's avatar

Science can be art too though. Here is the ovary of a deep sea angler

MissA's avatar

Art does not exclude science. But, science can exclude art.

marinelife's avatar

Art, although science can sometimes be beautiful too.

MissA's avatar

@marinelife…my point, in part.

SamIAm's avatar

art… care about it more, it’s more “my thing” but we need medicine!

TexasDude's avatar

An existence lacking in either would be no comfortable life.

rangerr's avatar

Without science, we couldn’t see the stars.
Without art, we’d have no expression.

@Fiddle_Playing_Creole_Bastard is right. It wouldn’t be comfortable at all.

MissA's avatar

I would agree that life wouldn’t be comfortable without either. But, the question was to pick one! C’mon @Fiddle_Playing_Creole_Bastard…what would it be.

cockswain's avatar

It would truly suck to give up art, but science is more important to humanity IMO. But the two aren’t necessarily mutually exclusive.

Zyx's avatar

The question is flawed, all art is math.

TexasDude's avatar

@MissA, okay then, if I had to give up one, I’d give up art. very, very reluctantly

WestRiverrat's avatar

@Fiddle_Playing_Creole_Bastard GA, because if you know science, you can always reinvent art. Stained glass is just science turned into art.

MissA's avatar

Hey @WestRiverrat…you forgot, so I gave @Fiddle_Playing_Creole_Bastard the lurve. Actually, I did so before reading that you did!

xxii's avatar

If I ever had to choose, I would choose science. Counter-intuitive, since I love photography, drawing, writing… but you can’t solve environmental or medical problems without science, and those are the issues we really need to tackle.

lucillelucillelucille's avatar

I will take art:)

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther