I think that was maybe me that mentioned the age of 16. and yes, both here in Spain and the UK the legal age is 16.
Now, are kids here more mature and/or able to handle sex better than kids in the US? No. The UK is almost the world leader in teen births and single mothers.
Why is the legal age of consent 16 here? well, I cant speak for the politicians that passed those laws, but when I look at the situation, I think I may have an understanding.
In the past, humans only used to live until about the age of 30. for the purposes of survival of the species, we have physically developed to be ready for sex at the age of 12. that may sound wrong or immoral, but nature is not subject to our morals, and in nature, as soon as a little girl has her first period she is more or less ready to have sex and to reproduce. they start to gather fat in certain parts of their bodies, they develop breasts, and are fertile.
So, by the age of say 11 to 13, accounting for both male and female, humans are ready to pass on their DNA. So, by the age of 14–15 it is more or less impossible to stop kids fingering each other and jacking each other off, kissing and having sex. that’s just how our bodies are made. so, what stops these kids from having sex? the parents rules, and education. Give girls sex education and they will fend off boys maybe for another year or two out of fear, before finally having sex with one of them.
So, at 14 our bodies are ready, by 15 we are usually seeking out sex. but, you also have religious ideas, moral ideas, and other ideas that see sex as a bad thing. This to me is where the number 16 comes in. it’s a compromise, to give religious groups, parents and activists a little satisfaction regarding their level of control over their kids.
So, 16 is because people think kids are not ready at 14–15. some would like to make it higher, like 18 or 21, but that is just not practical, because the fact is, by 16 you are capable of making choices, and it does not make any sense to outlaw something done between two consenting people who are not hurting anyone else. we can’t go filling up our prisons with horny 17 year olds. It’s just not reasonable.
So, when you take all that in to consideration, I think, that is how we have arrived at the age of 16, rather than older or younger.
I’m quite a fan of that program you have in the states, date line, with Chris Hansen. If you watch that program, it should be clear to anyone what is and what is not a sex offender. If an 18 year old guy turns up to meet a 15 year old girl for sex, and he brings chocolates and flowers and then craps his pants when Chris Hansen shows up, that is not a sex offender. If however it’s a 43 year old man who is going to meet a 15 year old girl, and instead of flowers and chocolates he brings vodka and rope, and when Chris Hansen shows up he tries to run, that is indeed a sex offender and should be locked up.
I think these laws need to change. I think we should do away with the concept of age relating to sex all together. There is no magic number where as you say, 1 minute past midnight the person is ready for sex. It just does not work that way. What I think, is we should probably have a test. A test where you have to prove that you know how HIV spreads, what other STD’s there are, where babies come from and how contraception works. You should also be required to prove you are capable of making decisions based on critical thinking. Once this criteria has been met, you should then be declared legal. As for how the tests should be carried out, well, it should be as anonymous as possible, and parents should not be informed as really, if they pass the test, it would be none of their business. If they fail the test, then yea, inform the parents.