I’m not a Christian; I’m an apostate, but I can try to outline what the position of the particular Protestant, the particular Lutheran denomination that I was raised in is and how that position compares to at least one other Lutheran denomination. Those two denominations represent only a fraction of Christians in the world, but it is the the position that I know the best.
The tone of my answer may reflect some of my own biases, but aside from that, I think it is pretty straight forward presentation of the doctrine.
I was was raised ECLA, that’s the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America. Their beliefs are actually pretty enlightened, in my opinion, relative to other Protestant denominations and relative to other Lutheran denominations.
This is a link to the ECLA’s official position regarding Salvation which is essentially what you’re asking about. Their position is basically that God is not at all as petty a mean-spirited, rule-driven, authoritarian hardass as other Christians seem to think He, she or it is.
(Note: 1. I’m going to use “He” from now on just so I don’t have to keep saying he, she or it and 2. Oops! There was a little bias coming through above, wasn’t there?).
From the ECLA’a statement of belief on salvation, the one I posted above, the following is a quote from Lutheran theologian Carl Braaten, who has helped shape the position of the ELCA:
Braaten says, “The Christian hope for salvation, whether for the believing few or the unbelieving many, is grounded in the person and meaning of Christ alone, not in the potential of the world’s religions to save, nor in the moral seriousness of humanists and people of good will, not even in the good works of pious Christians and church people…. There is a universalist thrust in the New Testament, particularly in Paul’s theology. How else can we read passages such as ‘for as all die in Adam, so all will be made alive in Christ’ (1 Cor 15:22)?” (See also Colossians 1:15–20, Ephesians 1:9–10, 1 Corinthians 15:28.)
Again, from the ECLA statement of belief on salvation, and I think this is the clearest statement on their belief:
If Jesus is the Lord and Savior, he is the universal Lord and Savior, not merely my personal Lord and Savior. Because Jesus is the unique and universal Savior, there is a large hope for salvation, not only for me and others with the proper credentials of believing and belonging to the church, but for all people whenever or wherever they might have lived and no matter how religious or irreligious they may have proved to be themselves. It is clearly God’s announced will that all people shall be saved and come to the knowledge of truth
And their statement ends with:
Will, then, all people be saved in the end? We must say with Braaten, “We do not… know the answer. (That) is stored up in the mystery of God’s own future. All (God) has let us know in advance is that he will judge the world according to the measure of his grace and love made known in Jesus Christ, which is ultimately greater than the fierceness of his wrath or the hideousness of our sin.
It think the quotes above, from the ECLA, about salvation states their position pretty clearly. They don’t believe that they can really know what the fate of nonbelievers and the nonreligious might be, but they believe, or at least hope that the God that they believe in, is a God of love and grace, not a petty, rule-directed, cosmic bureaucrat; and that He “will judge the world according to the measure of his grace and love made known in Jesus Christ, which is ultimately greater than the fierceness of his wrath or the hideousness of our sin.”
However, not everyone agrees with this position, most certainly not all Lutherans.
Enter the LCMS (Lutheran Church – Missouri Synod), the hard asses, the bad cop to the ECLA’s good cop, sort of.
A critique of the ECLA’s postition on salvation, Does the ELCA Teach Another Gospel?
from LCMS pastor, the Rev. Cary G. Larson , :
BTW, to summarize, he thinks that ECLA Lutherans are paving themselves a road to hell.
For many years, learned people, clergy and lay, have warned that the ELCA is in dangerous theological waters. It has been increasingly clear in recent months that not only is the ELCA in dangerous waters but is also a sinking ship as it relates to the true expression of Christ’s church.
Perhaps nothing is clearer than in the ELCA understanding of salvation. For many leaders of the ELCA have deviated from the biblical understand of salvation and practice what is know as Universalism, that is, a theological doctrine that all human beings will eventually be saved. Many have come to know this as the “Big God” theology where all roads lead to God with or without Jesus Christ. Popular secular icons such as Oprah Winfrey have even proclaimed this theology.
The reality is that the ELCA is not the church the average Lutheran person in the pew thinks it is. For many, the church is what they see every Sunday and what they participate in during the week in church related activities. However, in giving dollars to the ELCA by way of benevolences is actually promoting a non-Lutheran and even a non-Christian understanding of salvation and the role of Christ’s church in this world
The LCMS position on salvation is very much the same position of many fundemantalists. A belief in Jesus Christ, that Christ died on the cross, rose from the dead and ascended into heaven on the third day and that it is faith and grace alone, only that, that can guarantee salvation. At least as far as I know, that is the position of the LCMS. The complexities of the theology of faith, grace, justification, etc. I will admit, have always kind of eluded me. One of the many reasons that my road to asposty began around the age of 8.
And for the record, Larson says “the reality is that the ELCA is not the church the average Lutheran person in the pew thinks it is.” That is absolutely wrong, in my experience. ECLA Lutherans are where they are, in those particular pews because they know exactly what the Church’s doctrine is and they prefer it to the doctrine and dogmatism of the LCMS; they believe in a God that is a better, bigger, more loving God than the LCMS Lutherans seem able to fit in their tiny little minds; and in their tiny, mean, little hearts.
O.K., maybe the last little bit wasn’t necessary but I still have some LCMS relatives, distant ones, and I don’t care for their small-mindedness and their brand of fundementalism.
Anyway, did all that clear anything up? That’s just the beliefs of ECLA and LCMS Lutherans on this particular part. ECLA Lutherans are not necessarily representative of all Christians in terms of doctrine, they are actually relatively non-dogmatic. But no Christian denomination if necessarily representative of all Christians. As I mentioned on another similar thread, anyone seeking a consenses, anyone seeking one definitive answer to any one particular point of Christian doctrine is just plain shit out of luck, because there isn’t one, and there never will be one, there will never be one answer to any one question.