Thank you for asking this question.
What are questions supposed to accomplish on Fluther? The best way to answer this is by looking at the vision statement that Andrew and Ben came up with when they decided to create the site.
Our Vision for Fluther
When Andrew and I started Fluther over three years ago, we had a clear vision: we wanted to help people solve problems, in real-time, by matching questions to the right people. Our goal: be the best place to ask a question.
Looking at Fluther today, it’s remarkably close to what we envisioned. There are tons of smart people answering and helping tons of other smart people. It has also evolved in many ways we didn’t foresee, and we’ve tried to adapt it organically according to the community’s needs.
Ben and Andrew are the ones who own the site, and thus decide on the direction it takes. Considering that they are the ones that gave the green light to separate questions into the categories of General, Social, and Meta leads me to believe that they are content with members asking questions that are more than just technical ones.
Are the discussion type of questions, funny or not, regarded as sort of “low rent” by the Fluther establishment? Gracious no. Not to single them out, but @iamthemob asks some of my favorite discussions in the Social section that are more fact/belief related, while @wundayatta asks more interpersonal-probbing questions. They both add value in their own ways.
But it seems to me that if I really needed to know something, there are sources that would be more reliable than Fluther. Sometimes yes, but not always. One example is some the medical questions posted in the General section. Many of them are just looking for personal experiences from others that have suffered from the same malady. Often, they already have a doctor’s appt. scheduled and have done research on the internet. They just want to arm themselves with others’ personal experiences so that they can ask questions during their visit vs. walking in blindly and accepting a doctor’s diagnosis.
So isn’t part of the fun just simply making it fun? Or not? Since there aren’t any rules in the questions guideline about whether ‘fun’ is not acceptable, my feeling is that anything goes. As members, we can choose whether to participate or not.
Even some of the so-called questions that really are not, such as the recognition for achieving a Fluther level, have their own form of value. If a member is a regular visitor, they are bound to make personal online connections with others.
The fun ones, including some polls, provide information, such as a book/movie/website recommendation/recipe that turns out to be insightful. They can stress-relievers. There is value in that.
@Cruiser and @SundayKittens From my understanding on the thread referenced in this question, those two questions about naming items and whatever the other one was were set up in jest to prove a point by the OP. As ridiculous as the questions may appear to some, those that responded took it to heart.