What will Viagra and his friends do to marriages that had accepted no more sex?

If I were to Visio this question, there would be a decision point:
“Take Viagra?” Yes or No. If No, End
If Yes, the second decision point would be “Wife Supportive?”
If Yes, then coupled with the intimacy of the brain, the sex would be great.
If No, then the premise of intimacy of the brain would be flawed, and the paths would be:
Decision point “Would Husband Cheat?”
If No, then Unhappy Marriage>Marriage Counseling
If Yes, then Extramarital Affair

@BarnacleBill That sums it up nicely. I’d add decision point for the initial state.
Are both partners’ T levels in normal range? If No, then visit respective doctors.

I guess that one of the people in that couple hadn’t really “accepted” the ‘no more sex’ thing, then, had he?

Who would knowingly do both? That is, agree to “no more sex” and then “hey, I’m going to talk to my doctor about Viagra™”?

Decision point – Is one person exercising, controlling food intake and getting in shape? If yes, then other half should do the same.

No more sex in a marriage?! Well I guess that’s what office jobs are for, so you can hire sexy secretaries. LOL

Why give up sex? I mean unless I was completely and utterly unfit to perform anymore from a physical POV I just dont see why you would come to this.

Intimacy of the brain is great, but so is sex…. Id like to have my pan Cake and eat it too

I suppose some couples would be glad for a possible return to sex and those other couples who have ‘accepted no more sex’...methinks nothing like Viagra would help because their problems run deeper, imo (after all intimacy and sex should be more than whether he can get it up or not)...further, I don’t think intimacy of brain and intimacy of genitals are mutually exclusive.

Viagra doesn’t do anything for libido, it’s so a guy can get it up and keep it up when his brain is horny. Viagra is for people who already want to have sex.