@josie – you know that I’ve responded, strontly, sure, but not like that, on your other threads. It wasn’t appropriate – but, do note, that I was not the first, and that I was not the first to have the impression that the wording was way off base.
It’s completely appropriate to accuse someone who says “I bet it was a Muslim terrorist” of being, not a racist, but a sheep. We have been trained to live under, pardon the pun, a “veil of fear” about “Islamism.” Let’s broaden the perspective:
Since the late part of the 20th century, in Spain and France ETA conducted 36 terrorist attacks. ETA is a Basque separatist group.
In Africa there are many terrorist organisations. But the most notorious is the ‘Lord’s Salvation Army’; a Christian terrorist organisation in Uganda. They train young childrens to commit terrorist attacks. Currently, Ugandan lawmakers are pushing the death penalty for gays.
In Sri Lanka, the LTTE (Liberation Tigers of Tamil Elam – or Tamil Tigers) is the most notorious. They are experts in suicide bombings and they even train children to take part in suicide bombings, and Hindus (although the battle is more appropriately about traditional territory).
In India majority of the terrorist attacks are talked about the Kashmiri militants. In India there are terrorist organization belonging to almost all different religions. We have Sikh terrorist, the ‘Bhindranwala’ in Punjab. If you go to South Asian Terrorism portal run by Non-Muslims, and if you see the list of terrorist attacks done by all the people, you will find the Muslims in a minority. But that is never highlighted in the media.
On 5 June, 1984, the Indian Security Forces took over the Golden Temple in which 100 people were killed. In retaliation on 31 October, 1984, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi was assassinated by her Sikh security guard. In Tripura there are Christian terrorist organizations called ATTF (All Tripura Tiger Force) and NLFT (National Liberation Front of Tripura). On the 2 October, 44 Hindus were killed by these Christian terrorists.
In Assam we have ULFA (United Liberation Front of Assam). ULFA in the 16 years from 1990 to 2006 has conducted successfully 749 confirmed terrorist attacks. The ULFA will put the Kashmiri militants to shame. But in the newspapers we only hear of Kashmiri militant. Why? The ULFA are trained to kill the Muslims, they are Hindus. How many times do we hear about them?
Maoists in Nepal, in the past 7 years they have conducted 99 terrorist attacks. According to the Indian Government out of 600 districts in India Maoists are present in 150 districts of India. They have done terrorist attacks in one-third part of India.
Muslims founded the first NGO with a stated goal of ending terrorism. Terrorist attacks against the U.S. were not “primarily” Muslim until 2000. The majority of those were in the Middle East – where the U.S. is an occupying power at war, and so it’s fair to call them part of the insurgency. And, considering that we are a military presence, foreign invaders, is there any wonder that there is an increase in activity? Finally, it is 8 times more likely for a Muslim to be the victim of a terrorist attack, and non-Westerners are 38 times more likely to be victims.
And I’ll say, I don’t think you actively have an agenda. But considering how much of this “Muslims are terrorists” theme, and considering that it was a follow up to your hate speech thread, with all pretense dropped, it “smacked of agenda to me.”
Here’s my concern – profiling is, and always will be, a dangerous precedent. I think the new TSA procedures are a joke. I think we’re having our liberties invaded, and I think we’re being scared into a corner about an enemy that is, honestly, a nominal threat considering domestic crime so that it’s easier for those liberties to be invaded. Not suggesting conspiracy…just saying politicians are being politicians.
But this talk is leading to arguments that we should ban the burqa – which I agree with culturally, but legally would be a profound assault on religious freedom. Of course, I’m not trying to say “security bad.” But I want smart security that is reasonably targeted, not something that makes everyone get nekkid and smile for the camera and has a nominal potential increased safety effect.
Phew. Done. Now, I get the concern over radical Islam. However, I feel that we’re focusing to an undue degree on them and ignoring other, more significant threats because of it. Again, FBI stats show that the overwhelming threat seems to be from non-Muslims, and this is true even taking into account only the violent attacks and the threat is less than 1% in Europe.
I hate the idea of political Islam. I really do. I won’t accept it here. However, I also want to protect all of my rights…and considering that most of them are more, in the United States, under attack from conservative Christian right groups as well as violent right-wingers of the more home-grown variety…I see a more insidious threat right here.