Ok so youre saying the Greeks integrated the cultures of the Iberian and Crimean and Persian and North African and Indian and Afgahn etc. natives into their society? No, they pretty much just lived in trading posts or ruled kingdoms there.
And you call hundreds of isolated independent city-states scattered across the Mediterranean rim and the Aegean islands a “contiguous Empire”?
If Archimedes was an Indian living in the Indo-Greek Kingdom in northern India, I wouldn’t call him, or his inventions, Greek OR European.
But Archimedes was a Greek, from Magna Grecia, which makes his inventions Greek, and clearly European. Magna Grecia being, as it was, Greek, as it is, European.
Besides this point, although Alexander WAS Greek, his Asian Empire was no more Greek than England was French after 1066. We just had a king and ruling class from an until-then relatively inconsequential area of Northern France.
Are you saying Archimedes’ inventions were not European, because there happened to be a Greek trading post in Tunisia, and a Greek-blooded King in India?
The Greeks called the Romans Italian.
The Greeks also called Greece European.
The reason we don’t use the word European instead of Greek is that Greece is just a part of Europe, so we need to differentiate…
Now I’m not denying the fact that the Greeks owed a lot to Near Eastern and Egyptian civilizations, but I’m just saying that that doesn’t mean something invented by a European Greek man, in a European Greek city, is not a Greek European invention.