Social Question

Brian1946's avatar

If the story of Adam and Eve is true, wouldn't that mean that everyone from their grandchildren to the latest generation of humans, is the result of inbreeding?

Asked by Brian1946 (32650points) December 29th, 2010

I think some believe that they were the first and the only two humans on Earth until they had children.

If that’s so, wouldn’t that mean that their grandchildren were the result of inbreeding, yadda yadda yadda?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

36 Answers

Seelix's avatar

Yup. That’s one of the reasons that us infidels have such a hard time accepting creation theory.

tinyfaery's avatar

Yes. It would explain why people are so ridiculous.

marinelife's avatar

Yes, thus its implausibility as anything other than allegory.

faye's avatar

If there was only Adam and Eve who had 2 boys, there wouldn’t be any us unless it was incest.

Blackberry's avatar

Well, it’s highly improbable that it is true, so…...don’t worry about it lol.

everephebe's avatar

Actually I believe this is the one thing the bible might have got right. I remember reading somewhere that we each can trace our ancestors back to two common ancestors. Ancestors, putting the ‘cest into incest, since antiquity . I wish I could remember the source for this theory.

Judi's avatar

You have to read further in Genesis about the giants that came and bred with the women. Genesis 6
I don’t know how I missed it before, but it made me think we could be an alien hybrid.

Simone_De_Beauvoir's avatar

Sure, that’s how it would be. Since we aren’t inbred and can mate with each other, we aren’t descendants of Adam and Eve.

wundayatta's avatar

I though I heard that there were a number of other female children, but they weren’t mentioned in the stories because the story of Cain and Able was much more important.

I don’t know. I’m not sure if that’s an aplogia for the story (which, of course, makes no sense in a literal way), or the explanation for where all subsequent children came from.

And of course it’s all incest if they all came from the same parents. From what I understand now, scientists don’t think that random incest is a problem, genetically speaking. It’s just when it happens systematically, that the gene line becomes inbred enough to create problems.

Kardamom's avatar

Yes, I always thought that was kind of silly and gross and weird too. That is one of the many thngs that make me question why people believe in the bible—hook line and sinker. It’s an interesting book with lots of interesting “stories.”

SavoirFaire's avatar

If one accepts the narrow version of the story, which says that all of humanity came from two people, then we would definitely have to be the result of inbreeding. But if you’re already accepting this kind of story, it’s not too much of a stretch to assume that Adam and Eve had superior genes that could counteract the effects of inbreeding long enough for it not to matter. Perhaps this also accounts for the long lifespans of those early humans as well.

But when Cain is banished, one might think it is implied that he fears the outsiders with whom he will now have to live. This suggests a broader version of the story wherein Adam and Eve are not the only humans but ratehr the first of a clan that is of particular importance to the story being told.

In either case, I doubt the story is literally true.

SavoirFaire's avatar

@everephebe Y-chromosonal Adam and Mitochondrial Eve weren’t even alive at the same time, let alone sexual partners. So while we may all be related to both of them, they weren’t the sort of primordial pair with which mythologies are concerned.

everephebe's avatar

There might not be some chicken or the egg bibical incest but it is possible that we have Adam and Eve-like ancestors. And if not, let me assure you there has been plenty of incest historically.

coffeenut's avatar

Wouldn’t Adam and Eve’s kids be considered inbred?...... because Eve came from Adam…

JLeslie's avatar

Someone once told me, maybe this is a Jewish thing, or just a biblical thing, God purposely started with only two, so all people would have the knowledge that we are all related, all the same family.

JLeslie's avatar

Those of you worried about inbreeding, the chances of genetic disease with inbreeding is only very slightly higher than unrelated people, unless there is a specific genetic disease that both parents are known to have. It is a reasonable story that Adam and Eve possibly had fairly perfect DNA, since they were made in God’s image, and what has influenced disease on earth in humans, is the interaction with the environment over the centuries, and random mutations.

mrlaconic's avatar

I believe that Adam and Eve were the first humans created by Jehovah but that does not mean there were not other creations or beings.

Ancient Sumerian text and even the Bible itself tells us that there were other beings living on earth at the start.

Genesis 6 1–4 is a good place to start.

1 When human beings began to increase in number on the earth and daughters were born to them,
2 the sons of God saw that the daughters of humans were beautiful, and they married any of them they chose.
3 Then the LORD said, “My Spirit will not contend with humans forever, for they are mortal[b]; their days will be a hundred and twenty years.”
4 The Nephilim were on the earth in those days—and also afterward—when the sons of God went to the daughters of humans and had children by them. They were the heroes of old, men of renown

Who were the Nephilim? The nephilim are the fallen angels who were cast out were refe who are referenced elsewhere in the bible

Numbers 13:32–33, where the Hebrew spies report that they have seen fearsome giants in Canaan

32. And they spread among the Israelites a bad report about the land they had explored. They said, “The land we explored devours those living in it. All the people we saw there are of great size.
33. We saw the Nephilim there (the descendants of Anak come from the Nephilim). We seemed like grasshoppers in our own eyes, and we looked the same to them.”

There are effectively two views[16] regarding the identity of the Nephilim, which follow on from alternative views about the identity of the sons of God:

Offspring of Seth — The Qumran (Dead sea) scroll fragment 4Q417 (4QInstruction) contains the earliest known reference to the phrase “children of Seth”, stating that God has condemned them for their rebellion. (Nonetheless, a few commentators dispute the interpretation of this reference.)[citation needed] Other early references to the offspring of Seth rebelling from God and mingling with the daughters of Cain, are found in rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, Augustine of Hippo, Julius Africanus, and the Letters attributed to St. Clement. It is also the view expressed in the modern canonical Amharic Ethiopian Orthodox Bible.

Offspring of angels — A number of early sources refer to the “sons of heaven” as “Angels”. The earliest such references[17] seem to be in the Dead Sea scrolls, the Greek, and Aramaic Enochic literature, and in certain Ge’ez manuscripts of 1 Enoch (mss A-Q) and Jubilees[18] used by western scholars in modern editions of the Old Testament Pseudepigrapha[19]. However, “Angels” in this context has sometimes been considered to be a sarcastic epithet for the offspring of Seth who rebelled (see above). The earliest statement in a secondary commentary explicitly interpreting this to mean that angelic beings mated with humans, can be traced to the rabbinical Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, and it has since become especially commonplace in modern-day Christian commentaries.
Others do not take either view, and believe that they are not historical figures but are ancient imagery with questionable meaning.[20]
The fallen angels interpretation
The New American Bible commentary draws a parallel to the Epistle of Jude and the statements set forth in Genesis, suggesting that the Epistle refers implicitly to the paternity of Nephilim as heavenly beings who came to earth and had sexual intercourse with women.[21] The footnotes of the Jerusalem Bible suggest that the Biblical author intended the Nephilim to be an “anecdote of a superhuman race”.[22] Genesis 6:4 implies that the Nephilim have inhabited the earth in at least two different time periods—in antediluvian times “and afterward.” If the Nephilim were supernatural beings themselves, or at least the progeny of supernatural beings, it is possible that the “giants of Canaan” in Book of Numbers 13:33 were the direct descendants of the antediluvian Nephilim, or were fathered by the same supernatural parents.

BoBo1946's avatar

Oh my gosh, that means that all you guys are my brothers and sisters!

CaptainHarley's avatar

@BoBo1946

Frightening, ain’t it! LMAO!

Qingu's avatar

Common evolutionary ancestor =/= Adam and Eve.

CaptainHarley's avatar

Oh, get off your friggin high horse. If you listened to me at all, you’d know I don’t hold with “creationism.”

Kardamom's avatar

Does anyone know if Cain and Abel were teased in Junior High school when word got out that their parents were “doing it” even though they were brother and sister?

Smashley's avatar

You should look around. People have been asking this for years. As such, those who decided they had to believe the myths have long since done all the rationalizing required. I think I heard something about how they were genetically perfect then, but as people became more sinful, yadda yadda.

Berserker's avatar

Either that or Cain was actually a vampire and made us out of mud?
Depending on which branch of faith one believes, some of it changes, but essentially yeah, I guess it would mean we’re all inbreds.
Well, ya gots to start somewhere! :D

Supacase's avatar

Why is everyone so sure we aren’t inbred, or weren’t long ago? We have no idea how Adam and Eve looked or thought. After enough branches on the tree, the ‘defects’ would level out and be considered normal. Maybe that’s how we ended up with some of the shit diseases we have.

anartist's avatar

Yup. We probably would have been bred out of existence long ago, what with all those recessive genetic traits po9pping up with each generation.

MissAnthrope's avatar

We are inbred, at least in a diluted way. I read recently that genetic testing of people all over the world showed we are all cousins to the nth degree.. now I can’t find the link to tell you what n equals. It was close enough to have struck me, anyway.

Paradox's avatar

No wonder the majority of earthlings are intolerant and stupid. In all fairness there are a few decent enlightened people so I have some hope.

MissAnthrope's avatar

We all have:
2 parents
4 grandparents
8 great grandparents
16 great-great grandparents
32 great-great-great grandparents
64 great-great-great-great grandparents
128 great-great-great-great-great grandparents
256 great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents
512 great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents
1024 great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandparents…

This is merely after just ten generations! So, imagine in all the time people have existed, how many generations, then how many people involved.

SavoirFaire's avatar

@MissAnthrope Your great-great-great-great-great grandparents might be the same as my great-great-great-great-great grandparents. Once we take that into account, the numbers go way down. Not way, way down, but still way down.

(Yes, I created an ordinal system based on factors of “way” there. My apologies to any mathematicians reading this.)

Kraigmo's avatar

This is why schizophrenics think they’re related to celebrities and Jesus. Technically, they’re right.

BoBo1946's avatar

@CaptainHarley LOLL… you can say that again!

mattbrowne's avatar

Here’s some food for thought: Mitochondrial Eve is generally estimated to have lived around 200,000 years ago, most likely in East Africa, see

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_Eve

Berserker's avatar

There’s a video game that dabbles in this subject, which was based on a Japanese novel. See video games are educational lol. XD

ReindeerMoon1's avatar

Actually, and I don’t claim to be a Biblical scholar here, but Eve was Adam’s second wife, his first wife Lillith, was shaped from the earth, just as Adam was and was his equal in all things. Then Adam got it into his head that he should be the ruler over Lillith, to which she took exception and she argued with god saying “you made us both of this earth, you breathed the same breath into our bodies, I am not subservient to this man.” God then banished Lillith from the garden and she went gladly, she sang and danced and had many children. Meanwhile in the garden Adam became lonely so God created Eve from Adam’s rib that she be ever subservient. When Adam and Eve were cast out of the garden Lillith’s children were there as mates.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther