@auntydeb I sometimes find it very hard to avoid writing a leading question. I like to give examples of what I mean, because I’ve found that things tend not to be helpful if I don’t explain what I’m looking for, and the easiest way to explain is by example. Unfortunately, it is impossible for me to be well-rounded in my examples, and thus it becomes a leading question.
Here’s another example (but I hope not a leading one) of what I find useful: @Seelix comment that she didn’t understand why anyone would have sex except for a baby. I wondered the exact same thing when I was eight years old, right after my parents had taken me and my siblings to see a movie about where babies come from. To this day, the answer my father gave me kind of creeps me out. He said, “Because it’s pleasurable.”
Pleasurable. The word feels slimy on my tongue whenever I say it. Even thinking it makes me shiver. Sometimes I find myself using the word without really thinking about it, and then, when I notice, all those feelings of weirdness come back.
He was right, of course. And yet, it’s so much more than that. I think that word sounds so dry compared to what is really going on in a relationship where people also love each other. Maybe it’s that separation of pleasure from love that makes me feel icky. It’s a very strong feeling, and it makes it hard for me to understand how people can enjoy purely recreational sex.
There is always a relationship, and that is something I didn’t understand, probably until now when I just wrote it. It may be a very diaphanous relationship, but it is still there and it is what enables people to have their “recreation,” even if most of it is a fantasy they don’t share with their partner.
Complex stuff. Stuff I had no clue about, even five years ago. I mean, I knew it was there, but I really didn’t feel like I could understand it at all.
What is frustrating to me, though, is that so many of my explanations do not require the person to be aware of what is going on. So they can deny the utility of my explanation and yet it can still be useful to me, and sometimes to them, after they give it due consideration (or I browbeat them with it, lol).
Anyway, that’s one (or some) of the things I’ve learned about relationships that I didn’t understand as a child. It is another example, too, of what I was hoping for. Even so, it is also a leading example. I usually refrain from putting my own take on one of my questions for a while, to see what develops, because I don’t want to unduly influence the responses. But here it is. It’s my take. Anyone else’s take is equally valid, although not all are equally useful to me. That’s par for the course, here.