@iamthemob No, I never stated nor implied that gays were more likely to be child molesters. I did, however, state that the reason for the current BSA policy stemmed from a case where the BSA was sued when a card carrying NMBLA member (that’s the National Man Boy Love Association, who believe that sexual relationships between boys and older men are not only normal, but healthy) who was also in a leadership position was caught diddling the boys.
Now, given a choice between having a slimy lawyer argue that the organization is responsible for damages because they failed to properly assess the character of their leadership and having a lawyer argue whether or not the BSA, a private organization, has the right to take into consideration the sexual preferences of their leadership, in light of the above case I can understand whey they chose the latter.
Because you have a cause, however, the only thing you are willing to hear is “he must think that gay people are more likely to be child molesters.
Now, to bring this back to the topic at hand. The original poster stated:
“Dean of the school I teach in was just unbelievably rude to one of my students” and then attributed that to his age and race
then stated:
“The student sent the Dean a polite and thoughtful email expressing his concerns.
The Dean wrote back belittling the student and mocking the spelling/grammar in his email.”
Of course we have no way of knowing what the concerns were, how politely they were stated, and what constitutes belittling (I would, however, argue that the dean of a learning institution has an obligation to point out grammatical errors) But, that aside, once again she attributes his character defects to his race and age.
Then yet later states:
“I love it when old white men feel all persecuted and threatened.”
Which belies a perverse pleasure in persecuting and threatening old white men.
I stand by my opinion.