To me happiness is a surface-bubbliness. It’s a smile, it’s an overall lightness, it’s a laugh that starts in my throat rather than my gut. And it feels good to be happy, sure. But it’s a shallower feeling. Other light feelings, like joy, ecstasy, are like a glow spreading out from my core, or a tingling shooting out from my back to my limbs. Happiness is this border feeling, that is more outward-facing, more apparent to others, but gives me less.
To me intelligence is different from smarts, in that intelligence encompasses all sorts of smarts. It’s your mind’s ability to utilize your brain, your body. To be discerning. It’s an awareness and understanding. Smarts are inside of intelligence; they’re the individual, and often overlapping, skills and knowledges. I agree with Gardner’s Theory of Mulitple Intelligences, that intelligence isn’t one ability we have, but many that combine into unique balances within everyone. So, we have these smarts that are inside these intelligences that are inside our minds.
I don’t think that those with “disabilities” aren’t intelligent, just that they have a different balance of intelligences than is typically deemed by society as the proper and over-arching “Intelligent”
That said, because of how I see the two particular words, my answer is I’d rather live a life with intelligence.—I’m changing the phrase slightly, because it wouldn’t be a life only of intelligence, but one where I had my intelligence to go forth with.
I’d rather be fulfilled than just happy, even if that fulfillment is based in deeper, and sometimes darker, emotions. With just happiness I’d feel like I’d be living inside a bubbly shell.
To me, to choose a life of happiness over intelligence is not to just choose happiness over intelligence, but also surface over depth.
As to @DominicX‘s question: Well-liked/nice and unintelligent. sure don’t want to be an asshole!!