@JLeslie – “Yes, I think sex ed should not be part of a youth type program. I would keep to parents and schools.” -This is exactly what the GSUSA is doing (sex ed in the GSUSA program). You don’t need to take my word for it. It is in the Journey’s books, and a great portion (about ½) of the older girl book A Resource Book for Senior Girl Scouts (14years+). I would encourage your friend to get a copy of these books.
I appreciated chatting with you, JLeslie. You seem like a fair person who is open to looking at the whole situation rather than turning a blind eye.
@SavoirFaire – You’re starting to annoy me. I don’t care for your tone.
“You seem to be engaging in some very selective reading.” -Of course, I select what I read, it’s my choice.
“First, you have missed the point about worshiping false idols. You know, @JLeslie knows, and I know that Catholics do not worship Mary. But Protestants have spread that rumor—or, more accurately, that accusation—for a long time.” -If you read the entire thread, or the specific post, you will see that I was questioning what JLeslie was asking.
I said “Is this what you are referencing?” – You see, it has a question mark- it’s a question. I wasn’t sure. Simple as that. I wasn’t sure if JLeslie was asking about the AHG Statement of Faith or why Catholics are accused of worshipping Mary. I answered the typical question that I am asked by some people who are not Catholic- and I feel I explained that in the post. If I had missed the point, then JLeslie, is free to correct me.
“They also accuse Catholics of waiting too long to confirm members. When Christian groups talk about false idols and accepting Christ by age 12, then, it is not unreasonable to worry about anti-Catholic sentiments being behind it.” -I have friends of all faiths but, I haven’t had anyone ask me about a long wait to join the Catholic church. My conversations with people not of the Catholic faith are very respectful and I have not sensed any “anti-Catholic sentiments behind it.” I don’t think you’re looking for an answer either.
Honestly, I don’t know where you get this stuff.
“Second, you are misreading your own link. The USA Today article never says that anyone from the Girl Scout leadership is talking about sex or anything of the sort with troop members.”
-Actually, I’m not misreading my own link:
My words – “promoting sex education”
JLeslie’s words – “Meanwhile, I don’t think for a second Girlscouts is pushing or talking about sex with 10 year olds.”
My words – “It’s probably not happening in your friends troop/council, but it does happen.” – How do you know that I am not referencing the “pushing” of sex ed?
SavoirFaire if you just read the whole thread, you will realize that I didn’t “misread” my own link. Simple as that.
“It only says that the local Girl Scout organization has endorsed a sex education program devised by Planned Parenthood, not that the organization has used it. The part you misleadingly quote is about an event held by Planned Parenthood and attended by local students—students who may or may not be Girl Scouts for all the article says. It is not the local Girl Scout organization sending people to this conference. At least, the article does not corroborate any such assertion.” -Again, read the thread entirely – also, the link. Did you miss this?:
quote from http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2004-03-03-cookie-boycott_x.htm
“The Waco-area Girl Scout organization has been putting its name and logo on brochures for the Planned Parenthood sex-education programs but said it does not contribute any money and does not send girls to attend.” – And, yes, I was aware it was a local Girl Scout Council. I’ve stated this within my posts.
Anyways, SavoirFaire, try to read the full text and think about what you are going to type. This is exactly what I was referencing when I made the statement “you seem to reply haphazardly”.