This is an interesting question.
I went to look up the definition of oblivion, and to my surprise it didn’t mean nothingness (I thought it did). Because we do call death oblivion, and if we say there isn’t an afterlife, we try to imagine nothingness.
But the two definitions of the word: the state of being forgotten or unknown and the state of forgetting.
And it makes sense that we fear that. We’re not as worried about what’s to come as forgetting what has happened. Which is why so many (I know I am) are afraid of Alzheimer’s—among the many other degenerative diseases, head trauma—strokes, physical damage.
Also why we take pride in having better memory; of knowing.
Which is why the vision of an afterlife makes more sense. It’s not that we want to live for forever, necessarily, but that we never want to forget. We’re scared of forgetting.
(Personally, I think memories are stuck in the biology of our brain, coded into our neurons, so regardless of what happens after death, I don’t think I’ll remember my life. It is kind of an uncomfortable thought when I think about it in certain ways.)
“Every person ever born spent eons in oblivion right up to the moment of their birth”
Huh. It makes me question what the nothing/forgotten and the something/remembered are.
Because even if we are all nothingness before being born, and nothingness after… we still don’t know what nothingness means. Theories of matter and anti-matter give nothingness the potential of becoming something, and something the potential of becoming nothingness, at the smallest level.
And we are something now. At least what we consider somethingness So at our level, is there that potential? Because thinking about life in this way, now makes it seem like there might be.
Well so what the hell are we? Something out of nothing? Something always? I’m not sure I really like either.
This question leaves me in questions.
—Maybe that’s what we fear? The questions?