@jerv – Human hubris can become a problem. Remember what the engineers of the Titanic told everyone before its maiden journey. There might be an 8-inch crack in the unit #2 containment. It’s risky technology especially when built near the Pacific Rim of Fire. Tepco is one of the most reckless companies on our planet. We need a debate about their behavior.
http://www.fluther.com/116323/why-was-the-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-power-plant-built-to-withstand/
In 2005 the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEO) issued a warning asking engineers to “re-examine the potential dangers to nuclear power plants in the wake of the catastrophic earthquake that struck the Indian Ocean in December 2004, triggering a massive tsunami.”
“India’s Kalpakkam nuclear power plant withstood the giant waves, which engulfed its small township, home to India´s center for atomic research. Battered but safe, the plant shut down automatically after detectors tripped it as the water level rose. There was no release of radioactivity. The reactor was restarted 1 January 2005, six days after the catastrophic waves struck India´s east coast.
“There are scores of nuclear power plants operating in coastal areas and some of these may need to take a renewed look at this external hazard,” IAEA Director of Nuclear Power, Mr. Akira Omoto said. “It is also true for plants presently under construction.” It is common for nuclear power plants to be built in coastal areas, drawing the seawater to cool the reactor.
Specialists from around the world will scrutinize the potential impact of natural disasters on nuclear reactors, at the IAEA organized International Workshop on External Flooding Hazards at Nuclear Power Plant Sites.”
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/2005/tsunami.html
And what happened in Fukushima, Japan?
Answer: Nothing.
Tepco even tried to cover up existing problems leading to a huge scandal in Japan.
Given the Japanese history and the 2004 tsunami experience, I think Tepco’s behavior (and that of the Japanese government) was reckless to say the least. That’s gross negligence.
Please @jerv, don’t defend reckless behavior. If you wish to promote nuclear power be also critical when safety concerns are being ignored.