Nice. And true. I mean, the more variety we have, the more shit we learn. Even that which is, seemingly banal and mundane. You have quite an open mind, and I like how this question is snapping me back in line.
I get annoyed by some questions, some types of questions, and some methods used to present them. I often go, damn, this subject again? But people shouldn’t view things like that. I don’t know why people do it, myself included, or what it means, but when one thinks they’ve learned it all to the point of dismissing things their feelings tell them to, it means naught hath been learned. Or something.
It’s awesome enough that Fluther allows pretty much anything, all we have to do is watch our step on the guidelines. I get annoyed by relationship questions…but hell man, the person asking them might really want to know. Who are we to judge them by telling them their question ain’t valid? By telling them to get a life? I’ve never really voiced this opinion beyond nasty humour, but I sure thought it. Reminds me of like, how if someone tells you their nightmare they had last night, you might laugh and scoff. But it was scary to them. A problem is always a problem to someone if it affects them, even if the other thinks it’s insignificant. One man’s garbage is another man’s treasure and other such tralala.
Fluther allows for variety, why not use it instead of pissing all over the place trying to mark territory, yea? Awesome question, totally gives em cogs in me noggin’ a much needed turning.
That doesn’t mean, of course, that trollery, spam or pure imbecility (wow that’s a word? my spellchecker didn’t even kick in, well I’ll be damned) should be allowed, which is why we have guidelines. I’m also not treating censorship, which Fluther may, or may not have. I think I dissected my main point away from such examples that would otherwise render my whole answer void, though.
So if there isn’t room for everyone, there should be, given the premise of the site, and our so called calling for learning and wisdom.