@Cruiser They eat well, sleep well, know all the ins and outs of living life for free and apparently so do thousands of others (or more).
What blew me away is they refused his offer of new clothes and were horrified when he washed their clothes that are held together with dental floss stitching as their outerwear is their meal ticket. Apparently you can’t get handouts looking good and smelling good. I know homeless people now and in the past; some are even family members. Yes, there are some who just don’t want the responsibility of paying for garbage, electricity, a roof over head, utilities, etc. I knew this one guy who moved to Nevada to live with his G/F but left after 6 months because he lived on the streets (by choice) so long he felt cooped up in a room. He had his system down, he knew when the restaurants were disposing their “kitchen bags” and was right there to get it out of the dumpster. They even knew they would see him there. Strange enough this food they (the restaurant ) was about to toss out they could not hand to him because it was illegal, but it was illegal for them to toss it and have him eat it once it was considered garbage, riddle me that.
I guess how you are dressed and your success goes off the area you live. Homeless around here do not want to look grimy because they say it hurts their pan handling, they can’t look rich but they can’t be ragamuffins either.
@WestRiverrat There are enough programs and aid available that most of the chronically homeless in the US are homeless by choice.
Even small cities have at least one place the homeless can go to get a meal, a chance to clean their clothes, a shower and a bed.
I would gather most of the homeless are there not by choice, at least many I have had the chance to speak with. If you have a mental illness it is sort of a de facto choice because you have no faculties to choose better. A lot of the others got there because their home burned, they lost their job, housemates moved, or they were living with family that died leaving them to fend for themselves. They would rather not be homeless. Those that are or were homeless say it is better in a large city like LA, SF, Sacramento, etc because the small cities do not have the resources and are less tolerant to having poor homeless people around. Even if there happen to be a shelter, they are never large enough for everyone in need. They may have 60 beds but when you have 125 people needing them someone is left out.
@john65pennington Some homeless people are really pitiful and some have made this a way of live for them, when they could work at some job. I am speaking to those who got there unwillingly but find it hard to get out because they can’t acquire or hang on to the tools and goods that will help them out.
Many homeless individual people are ex convicts and no one will hire them. I did not have much sympathy for them. Then should they be called CNS (convicts not serving) and be treated as free-range wards of the state? If they can never have the “ex” in ex-con mean anything then why not have them still be cons and the state support them? At some point you have to give a person a second chance. Some don’t care or try hard enough but why would anyone try if the door is forever shut? (Though that is a question in its own right)
Money is the name of the game. Most governments do not have money in their budget to support homeless people. Strange the government don’t have enough to take care of its citizen here in need but whenever they want to start or fight a war they can crap money out the wazoo or find it in the sofa cushions no matter how expensive it is. Does that seem right?
I hate to say but in this area when a crime is committed against the homeless they are not quick to call the cops because the cops treat it as a nuisance to have to come out. The homeless I know say they feel more like the perp than the victim because they have to deal with the same cops harassing them or moving them from one area to another because someone didn’t want them were they were.