@Cruiser Since I wear clothes, does that make me a hypocrite? Maybe to a Naturalist. I suspect anyone who wears garments seem other than natural to them. Myself, I see clothes as being functional, if I had no pockets where would I put my wallet and keys?
@zenvelo Some people don’t express their preferences as “natural”; they may prefer women with a lot of make up , or with implants, or with shaved areas. Those people are not being hypocritical. Many men love a woman who is glammed up and well-manicured. I know guys who would not even consider a woman unless high-maintenance. They would be hypocritical saying the want a “Natural” woman but won’t deal with any woman who doesn’t have a teased, bleached, permed, styled, etc coif, and her lashes done, lips polished, etc. Some guys I know won’t even consider a woman if she doesn’t have a rack that enters the room 20 seconds before she does, even if you can drain them with a hat pin if you stuck it in deep enough.
@marinelife Isn’t that close to asking a woman if she has a boob job? Since I am not ashamed of it, I am. I didn’t really have the choice in it and if I did I may have chose the same thing. I can’t remember anyone in grade school not being cut. The pissing trough doesn’t lend to much hiding. Are you silicone-less? I love my women a natural 34A-B. ;-P
@mazingerz88 Thing is a lot of women can really pull it off NOT being natural. I concur, there are women who look better in makeup than out of it. Oprah for one. I say those women better keep away from camping. The woman that will emerge from the tent on day three might shock a lot of people because she won’t have the war paint to hide behind unless she is planning to bring half of a beauty parlor with here. They don’t call it made up for nothing.
@Facade When I say I’m “natural,” I’m referencing my extremely coily hair and the fact that I try to stay away from unnecessary chemicals as much as possible when it comes to food, hygiene, etc. I can only see being “natural” as hypocritical if the person is doing the opposite of what they say. The fact it goes beyond the coif, it extends to everything else. Not that anyone intends on being hypocritical about it, that even those who desire to be “Natural” or “organic”, cannot be totally, or it would be hard to do. A person who wanted to do that would find it hard working in a corporate office with a long beard to his belly and a mane to match, not to mention, the possibility of sweating through his shirt because he wore no antiperspirant. It is like a person wanting to live “green”, no matter how you try you cannot live 100% green in modern society. If you use a cell phone, wash your clothes with detergent. Even if you take a bus and not own a car you are leaving a carbon footprint. There is no way you could not use anything that contributes to the carbon footprint on the planet. It just can’t be done.
@incendiary_dan Who says removing hair is unnatural? Point me out a race of people or a species of animal that shaves its hair or fur as oppose to it naturally shedding and I will agree with you. Less those breeds that are born hairless or nearly hairless I don’t see any that go out to remove hair because they don’t want it on their bodies. To say intentional hair removal is natural in a biological way would be to say tattoos are just as natural. You can get them even if you did not make an effort to get one. Grooming is slightly different from what the body does naturally or not. If you had a really hairy chest would you wax it baby butt smooth?