@Supacase 6–10 y/o girls should not be the target demographic for anything considered sexy.
Examining it from a different perspective, always the humanistic pragmatist, I would think the manufactures that create a line of thongs marketed to preteens are doing so not with any intention of putting the girls on some jail bait radar, or hoochie list, but to sell an illusion, a dream. One can hardly debunk the idea that attractiveness, and being sexy in this society is given considerable weight, along with fame, wealth, and youth. If one can sell the young women that they will be more fashionable desirable and ”in” to boys if they have their brand of thong I can see them as in it for the money alone.
@rooeytoo But isn’t it strange that it is considered a faux pas to have a panty line but it is the fashion of the day to show off your bra straps.
I always thought that rather inconsistent too, when I was a kid, exposed bra straps were as bad as your slip hem showing under your skirt.
@ucme Okay maybe that’s a little harsh, but it did fit the joke quite well at least.
Have to admit, it was rather witty.
@bkcunningham I read the original post and the comments and thought; what a contrast in opinions regarding parental roles and societal roles as discussed in a previous thread about two teenagers who were posting racy photos on the Internet.
That is the rub, isn’t it, trying to have both sides of the coin and neither landing “up”? People bemoan sexualizing young girls because they fear older men will hit on them or worse, they will be snatched off the street, but at the same time so much of the media places such a high premium on being sexy and attractive. With sex being mostly a commodity that is a part of relationships and dating, generations back where girls would never think of posting pics of themselves in suggestive manner for the titillation of people they know, much less strangers over the Net.
@linguaphile Before ass-floss were invented, we went commando to avoid VPL. Commando’s quite a bit more comfortable than thongs and provides the same level of “protection,” doesn’t it?
I think in some cases it might. I knew women in the past who preferred that over undergarments. As fickle as this society is to say you go commando could get you cast in an even less favorable light than if you wore thongs.
@gorillapaws At least it’s better than pre-teen crotchless panties (sadly, not by much though).
These days a company could market that on top as being functional somehow, but underneath for the sexiness or the apparent sexiness of it. With some areas letting boys use the girl’s restroom they can bill it as not having to take down any more than is necessary, having them can save you seconds not having to pull them up, if you are in a skirt, you do not have to take down anything, etc. Sad thing, some savvy ad people will get people buying them without too much thought.