@gorillapaws
I’m not sure how you figure that an ID targets anyone other than those that shouldn’t be voting or voting more than once. There should be some integrity in the system and if there’s another way to get it, I’d be happy to listen.
As for your arguments against the Tea Parties, you obviously know little about them. There is no expansion of the military or bedroom politics in they’re position. And they don’t want the government between them and their doctors. You’re reading too many liberal bloggers.
The tax rates are not the problem. In fact when the rates have declined, the economy grew as did tax receipts. You all love to assume that the economy is independent of the tax rates. It isn’t. I find it amusing that Lofgren would argue that SS and Medicare are not entitlements (a position I agree with) and then use them to show the tax code is regressive. Either they are a tax and the benefit is an entitlement or they are not a tax and the benefit is actually owed to you. I don’t know how he argues both sides. And as for State taxes, it is the Democrats that are continually raising sales, property, and other taxes for the same growth of government they want at the federal level. If you think State taxes are too regressive, stop raising them.
He wants to argue that a higher tax on $million wouldn’t hurt small business but that has never been proposed. Obama has belligerently stuck with his $200—$250K figure while always saying millionaires and billionaires, as if they were the same group. And if your worried about the zero tax paid by GE and others, why would you think that raising the rate would change that? If you want to address the loopholes, we can have that debate. Hell, I’d be solidly behind that. Stop letting hedge fund managers claim thier income as capital gains, I’d vote for that. Stop counting futures profits as long term capital gains. Hell they’re short term by definition, I’ll vote for that. Eliminate all subsidies, I’ll vote for that as well. What I won’t vote for is a raise in the rate, either income, capital gains, or corporate. You may find other Republicans would support those changes as well. Unfortunately, Obama won’t allow anything to get proposed that doesn’t raise the rates. The other problem we’d have with these changes is with the Tea Parties since they don’t want additional revenues to go to increased spending. I can understand that point. I’d like to see the revenues going towards reducing the debt rather than another useless stimulus package.
We currently are spending over 40% of our GDP in both federal and state. It is difficult to compare this with other countries since they typically only look at federal spending. When you say we are the lowest taxed in the First World, I’d need to see some backup for that which includes both state and federal.
In general, I haven’t glossed over anything. Unfortunately when I respond to an issue, I like to know the facts. When someone such as Lofgren goes on a tear with a laundry list of complaints, it’s difficult to address each one without writing a book. We’ve only touched on a few of them so far and I’ve already written more than most people are willing to read. There are solutions that we could find that will garner support from both Democrats and Republicans. We are not pursuing those in an attempt to impose our ideology on the other guys. Obama is widening that rift with his policies and rhetoric. Continuing to call Republicans evil, will not bridge that gap. Until we admit there is a real difference of opinion, the gap will only get wider.