@whitetigress, this isn’t to diminish your sense of outrage, but to maybe challenge some assumptions in your question.
I’m not saying who should and shouldn’t be protesting, but for the poor how is today different from any other day? What’s the difference between being in the bottom 30% (or whatever) on a day when the rich and the middle class split things 50/50 vs a day when the rich and the middle class split things 90/10? I’m not saying I like this or that this is how OWS is breaking down demographically, I’m just asking how is the experience of poor people measurably different to the extent that it is more important now to buck the system than to carry on surviving?
as a corollary, one thing that’s useful to understand about human behavior is that frequently people resist change until it is too uncomfortable to do anything but change (e.g. hitting rock bottom).
Take a lesson from history (or at least my vague understanding of this chapter…) During Viet Nam, who was doing the protesting and who was being drafted? Again it was college students doing the protesting and poor people (I believe) being drafted. I think what you are perceiving relative to this split between protest expectations of the poor and the educated is a function of each cohort’s expectations, understanding and (perceived) competence relative to political engagement. There was a question a few weeks ago about the merits of a petition to forgive student loans. Again, it was a myopic, college-educated crowd essentially asking for a bailout because they were “sophisticated” enough to believe that forgiving the debts of 10% of the U.S. population would literally fix the entire economy.
Secondly, I would encourage you not to take the idea of debt (and I assume you mean national debt) personally. The reality is that you or “your generation” will never be made to account for that debt in terms of taking money out of your pocket to pay it down to zero. It doesn’t work that way, even though the news and other outlets hold this over our heads as if we are personally responsible. IMHO, you are much better off just ignoring this notion altogether, although others may disagree. I would also encourage you to learn about the concept of odious debt. It’ll make you feel better.
Thirdly, other than for their gullibility, perhaps, don’t blame the previous generation for the current mess. We are all led by the nose, yourself and your generation included, to support shit that is mess-making. (U.S.) politics is, in part, a process of fooling the masses to get power and then using that power to enrich people who are not the masses. The fooling process begins very early in life (in arenas other than politics, usually), and it’s very difficult to correct. The stupid decisions that people made 20 years ago or 40 years ago or more were at least partly manufactured by power hungry people who relentlessly advertised supposed benefits of adopting a certain way of thinking to get the masses on board. The same is happening today on a much more sophisticated scale, so don’t think that some twenty-something isn’t going to be looking at you in 40 years feeling incredulous at your generation’s gullibility.
I don’t know how poor people do not feel outrage every day or how they stuff their outrage at the injustices in their lives. It baffles me sometimes. I’ve lived in material comfort my entire life and am college educated and spent much of my waking hours in anguish over how fucked up things are universally. In the end, I don’t think it is affirming to be ignorant or to be battered into submissiveness or to be anguished. Probably it’s better to just be good to yourself and to other people, but it requires letting go of these giant ideas that seem so important (and important for thoughtful, educated people to solve). Relative to this problem, there’s nothing to solve really but the problem of greed (or whatever you want to call it), and that likely cannot be solved without some Ghandi-like clarity of perception.