@Dutchess_III I do worry about that. Is this a situation where if you have a hammer, all problems start looking like nails?
Still, does it make sense to think that because we got along without a hammer all these years, doesn’t that mean we still don’t need it? For years and years, all we had for mental illness was therapy, for the most part. There were a few drugs and electroshock therapy, but mostly it was talk.
Now there is so much more. Now the drugs are getting more plentiful. They still are hard to know what will work for whom, but now that we have them, are we running around looking for problems they might fix, or are we really uncovering all those problems that we always there, but no one paid attention to because we had nothing to use to fix them with?
My suspicion is that there is a lot more mental illness out there than our new tools are allowing us to find and deal with. That’s because there is so much stigma attached to mental illness. No one wants to admit to it. I know I don’t. No one in real life know about me except my group members and my closest family (wife) and a few friends (few of whom were able to maintain our friendship now that they know).
I look at it in terms of opportunity costs. What is the cost of over-prescription of meds and therapy compared to the cost of lost productivity when someone is not treated who could have been.
I think there is a prejudice that a lot of mental health care—such as talk therapy—is coddling. On the other end, I don’t think people have a clue as to how much is lost when someone is depressed—how not only work productivity is lost, but also the person drags down entire systems of people. If this group were not drawn down, they would do so many different things that would make not just the sick person happier, but a lot of other people as well.
My guess is that the cost of not providing care we can provide but that is needed is far greater that the cost of care we do provide that is not needed. It is not that expensive to provide mental health meds and the benefits are huge because they help much more than the patient.
But there is a large prejudice against mental illness and mental health treatments, so people don’t get what they need because of the stigma. Nations that reduce the stigma should do better, if I’m right. Nations that provide more treatment should also do better. Problem is, there’s no way of knowing what things would have been like if a person had not been sick, because we can’t measure what didn’t happen. All we can do is compare groups of apparently similar characteristics. Even that is difficult to do, since we can’t hold all the other factors steady.