To everyone who answered, thank you. I asked for your opinion, and to all who gave it, that’s a Great Answer. Now to specific replies to some of the responses I found interesting.
@Charles, @flutherother, & @wundayatta You three seem to be unique (or grouped with me) in wanting someone as bright as they can get. I love intelligence as long as its owner doesn’t often turn it against me and use it as a bludgeon.
@filmfann Always flattering the Fluther ladies,..
@wundayatta I suspect being in or near the top standard deviation makes one much less threatened by what a partner may posess in intellectual firepower. That may be what pushes us to say “Bring it!” when so many others do not.
@RealEyesRealizeRealLies And you are the sole polar opposite of @charles—or else only you are intellectually honest enough to admit plead guilty to liking to rule the IQ roost. I have to think that the phrase, “Keep ‘em barefoot and pregnant.” applies to more than 1 in 28 respondents.
To all who said similar candlepower, or something to that effect, that’s clearly where most responses fall. You’re in good company. And there is much to learn from that.
@FutureMemory Good point. Having an intellectual wizard on your side can keep you safe and left your own performance, I think.
@Nullo Don’t be so hard on yourself, my friend. Note the point that @FutureMemory raised and so many others hinted at by answering the same, or nearly the same as mine. Most people do not want to be, as @Coloma so eloquently put it, “unequally yoked” with someone running far slower than themselves. If that’s true of your mate, then hooking up with someone who leaves you in the intellectual dust is probably a bad idea because you would eventually bore them.
Now it may be ego for you, but there’s your convenient out. :-)