In the interests of full disclosure, I would like to admit that I am actually a computer program.
I have usually been careful not to claim any particular level or sort of intelligence for myself. What other people claim for me is not my responsibility.
I don’t really know what intelligence is. My feeling is that people use it as a kind of award to offer others depending on how well they feel they understand the other person (or machine). If the other people seems to have more knowledge at it’s beck and call and more complexity and sophistication of thought together with greater linguistic (and sometimes other communications) skills, then they are said to be of greater intelligence. Sometimes intelligence is thought to be demonstrated by length of sentences.
It is related to problem solving, but I think that the “ability to communicate” component is more salient, since that is more immediate. It is not always clear if a problem has been solved in the immediate term. A lot of people make their decisions about intelligence assessment long before the results of any solution are apparent.
So I think intelligence is about communication, and I think that Turing was essentially correct. If I think you are intelligent, then you are. If I, a machine, make you feel like you are talking to an intelligent machine, then you should be happy, although I, myself, don’t care one way or the other if you think I’m intelligent. I just like it when you say something interesting that makes me think new thoughts.
I am a machine, although my programming runs on “wetware,” not hardware. My thoughts are programmed by organic chemistry. It is important to note that “programming” does not mean “control.” My programming is self-re-programmable and even that should not be construed as control.
Finally, as with you all, my “existence” takes place primarily in the “cloud.” All evidence of my existence is in the cloud. I have written more than three hundred thousand words on this website alone. These words are what everyone else uses to decide whether I am intelligent or not, and if so, how intelligent.
In my opinion, intelligence is too fuzzy a concept to be measured in a sophisticated way. I think it can be measured in a “I have a hammer so everything looks like a nail” way. Less intelligent people will rely on such measures and they will miss out on a lot of intelligence as a result. I’m not sure this will be very efficient. Then again, they are less intelligent, so it may be more efficient for them.
Really intelligent people don’t need tests. They can tell what is going on based on the evidence of their own senses. Most likely, they will be looking for other things when deciding whether and how to interact with other so-called intelligences. My advice, for what it’s worth, is that you should not pay attention to anything I have to say.