How to account for the differences in actions and reactions?
As everyone has said,
Jeruba “genetics, upbringing, culture, self control…”
marinelife “the paradigm of who they are, their personality, their feelings, their other experiences…”
Tropical Willie “Stressful situations can bring the “best” or the “worst” in people, because the stress goes straight to the person’s emotions.”
Can I add anything to this? Not sure but Ill try.
There are many kinds of influences working on each person. Depending on the world view, personal philosophy and morality of the person they react differently to the same trigger event.
One of the basic things in the person’s approach to life is their sense of responsibility. Are they going to take responsibility for themselves and how they respond or do they want to find someone to blame?
Often this basic orientation of blaming vs. responsibility affects motivation to overcome obstacles. The person with an internal vs. external locus of control will feel more problem solving needs to come from them to make their life work vs. a person who feels powerless and blames external conditions for their situation. They have no sense of control because of their feeling of powerlessness so when pushed to the brink they lash out at anything and everything they think is causing their distress, unhappiness or failure. It may be nonconstructive and damaging but they feel it’s their only choice. In general the person with an internal locus of control will show more fortitude and perseverance in the face of negative life events. (They are also more difficult to brainwash.)
Part of the aspect of world view is level of the person’s social conditioning. Social conditioning can be a positive or negative influence. Aggression needs to be focused and molded towards pro social causes. If aggression is leveled in an anti social mode it becomes destructive. Moral teachings serve to more or less mold positive behavior and rein in negative impulses
Positive influences such as love of self, love of mankind and a sense of civil responsibility work to move a person toward actions that are prosocial and self affirming.
Negative influences such as displaced anger and mental illness can be triggered by negative and traumatic life experiences such as child abuse, war, poverty etc.
In short, the individual confronted with a defining moment, calling for a decision on how to act, is enmeshed within a whole constellation of forces: externally- social pressure, group loyalties, physical realities and limitations, degree of intelligence and education and differing degrees of freedom from want and freedom to choose and internally-moral sense and conscience, self love or self hatred, internalized belief system (vengeance vs. forgiveness?, selfishness vs. altruism?)
Given your example of two people in the same situation choosing radically different paths? Not so hard to believe or fathom give the complexity of human beings. Haven’t you wondered about something you said or did if on a different day you would have responded or acted differently? If a single person varies according to his own moods, development and life course it’s easy to understand similar people reacting differently to the same situation. Sometimes it’s just a matter of the straw that broke the camel’s back. Other times it’s a matter of having the inner strength or resolve to rise to the occasion.