Which looks better for shirts. Printed or embroidered?
I would like to know which people prefer most. Whether printed tees or embroidered.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
9 Answers
I think embroidered looks classier.
It depends on the occasion and the place. Embroidered is definitely higher fashion, but if you are going to sweep the floor, a printed tshirt is just fine.
Embroidered looks more qualitative, but if you want, say your dog, on a t-shirt you would have to go for printed ;)
I always choose embroidered for sweatshirts, but I can’t say that I have ever seen an embroidered t-shirt. All of mine are printed.
Hollister or other brands always have their brand or logo embroidered..
It depends on the size and nature of the graphic.
I like both seems to matter in what look your going for at any particular time and or event you wearing that articular shirt,
Printing on a t-shirt, embroidered on a polo shirt. The polo shirt can cope better with the weight of the embroidery, and the weave of a polo shirt is less suited to printing.
Embroidery looks nicer, but printed is more comfortable. A lot of embroidery is scratchy on the inside.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.