I fail to see what is so important about writing by hand. Yes, if we didn’t have computers and other machines that facilitate written communication, we’d need to do it by hand, but we do have these machines, and they are ten times more efficient than writing by hand, at least for some of us. Wundayatta, for better or for worse, would not exist without computers. Without Wundayatta, some four hundred thousand or more words of writing would not exist. The thinking I did would never have been done if I had to write by hand.
I think that writing will become a specialized skill like carpentry. It’s not going to be a universal thing any more. Only those who need it in daily life will be able to do it. I don’t see how anyone could make a convincing argument that everyone needs to do handwriting every day.
In the old days, there were ways to provide signatures without being able to write, so I don’t think that’s all that important, either. There are other ways do “sign” things besides a hand signature.
You can do a lot of things with handwriting, and taking notes is one of those things. Studying is another. But those are learning skills, and aren’t used except in school, for most people.
The main point is that you do all those things in other ways. There is very little you can do with handwriting that you can do in no other way. The things you can’t do otherwise…. well, not sure what they are. I was thinking caligraphy, but that’s just another type face.
I think it is important not to hold onto old technologies and say they are extremely important just because that’s all you know. You need to recognize there are other ways to do things and that what you feel about it could be mere prejudice.
I have not seen one convincing argument here to say that handwriting is irreplaceable. Not even close.
Oh, and I can both print and write cursive. Not that you could read it. Although I could make it legible if I wanted to take the time. A loooooong time.