@zensky I assume you are testing me, and that you know full well that, as Onan’s seen was greed, not birth control or masturbation using a vagina for the cecessary stimulation. Onan wanted his brother’s inheritance for himself, and so he refused to do as the law required, and give his sister-in-law a child who would inherit his brother;‘s estate.
@GracieT I should have made that distinction in the question details. Yes, some forms of birth control do act on a fertilized egg, and thus could be characterized as very early term chemical abortion.I;m interested here in forms of birth control that DO NOT act on a fertilized egg, buit rahter prevent fertilization from ever happening to begin with.
@YoBob As I pointed out to @zensky above, those who try to make Onan’s sin about birth control or masturbation. I’m with you in finding the law as it was then a bit quaint. As an only child, it wouldn’t legitimize my getting a piece of my brother’;s wife anyway.
@Qingu Yes, I often bring Exodus 21:22 up to anti abortion crusaders. I know it’s pointless., Their minds are already made up, and they cannot be “confused” by the facts—even those in the Bible or Torah. But it’s great fun to watch these people who insist on literal interpretation of the Bible tie themselves into a pretzel trying to come up with some will explanation for why this particular verse can’t be interpreted literally.
@thorninmud Yes, when it comes to someone letting their brother just die because it offends their bluenose attitude, it is no longer even remotely funny. It is sick and moral;y depraved.
@judochop No, it’s not about adultery. The Law required that is a man;s brother dies without having gotten his wife pregnant> It had to do with inheritance of property and wealth. Onan wanted his bnrother’s estate for himself. God could have simply made coitus interruptus not working. Instead, God made an example of Conan
@http://www.fluther.com/139659/where-in-the-bible-does-it-say-all-forms-of-birth/#quip2371253