I do feel oblivious about the world, but not just the ‘rest’ of the world, most of the US too (like Iowa…) Everything is so tightly contained in the media, and the same few stories are repeated past recognition, and most of the over-hyping in the presentation makes me feel sick, so I hardly watch anyway.
Most of my awareness of the world now comes from listening to NPR, which seems to at least repeat less, whatever I run into online (and I do search and look,) and whatever worldy-questions pop up on Fluther.
It’s not because I don’t want to know, though. I’m at a bit of a loss of how to, and how to know the information I’m getting is even accurate—because I’m not there, I don’t know. I don’t fully trust most of what I hear, I don’t feel like I can, and I’m not exactly sure where that mistrust comes from. It gets wearisome sometimes.
As for the Time cover spectacle—I saw the first online-uproar via a picture going around Facebook. It was an image of Time’s December cover in four different locations—USA, Europe, Asia, South Pacific. “REALLY?” (said the caption) “You know we have the internet, right?”
So I went to Time’s website to see the December edition for myself. Here
And then sent an email to a few people, with the subject: TIME: “Why Anxiety is Good for You” (aka, in the US, we sell you, you).
The nice thing about seeing the actual Time website, is they also show you the contents of the magazine, for each region they send it to. Another layer of interesting.
Apparently, from the magazine covers, they feel like Americans need a drastically different visual-grab than the rest of the world.
On the contents, it’s a little murkier, but something immediately clear—it’s four different magazines, essentially. Each region has a different selection of articles. (The US’ contents page is noticably longer in this particular month, but it also has an article about Burberry coats…) I’m not sure what the differences mean, I just notice that they’re there, which makes the selection of articles for each region seem eerily tailored.
This issues reminds me of an information-version of the controversies over how magazines photoshop Beyonce—lightening or darkening her true skin tone. I couldn’t find it, but there was one magazine that, with the exact same picture, gave Beyonce a different skin tone for each world region (darker for Africa, lighter for Europe/US, more tan for Asia) targetting the supposed majority skin tone in each area. That was disheartening to hear about, too.
There’s something wrong when the media’s trying so hard to SELL that they censor content to please the local viewers, or to seemingly please… Feeding us what they want us to see, or what they think we want to see, or what we, in our specific cultures, expect to see…
We can’t be a true global community if each country/nation/culture/region is only fed bits, slanted bits, of the whole… we already all disagree on plenty.
If this is the way everything’s done… no wonder we all feel so divided.
Still, Time sells. We buy.
But maybe I’m reading too much into it. I don’t feel yet like I know enough about the world to tell if I am or not, sadly.