@Skaggfacemutt I agree it isn’t government’s job to legislate morality. But I don’t see smoking and eating as issues of morality. They are issues of health, and I think it is the job of our government to help us take care of ourselves. We all have an interest in good public health. I presume, you are not interested in having AIDs or flus or whatever spread around. Obesity and violence and addictions are equally important public health issues. Maybe more so, because they are more costly.
Perhaps I am wrong, but I would have thought you want to save money, not make life more costly. To me, issues of helping other people around the world are cost/benefit issues. We are better off—WE, the Americans—when we help others around the world. Of course, what constitutes “help” is a very important issue. We have historically “helped” other peoples in ways that they didn’t like so much; ways that were purely in our own direct self-interest; not our indirect enlightened self interest.
Still, in principle, if people around the world become wealthier, they will form bigger markets for stuff we make, and we’ll get that much wealthier. If people around the world dispose of toxic chemicals safely, our air and water will be cleaner, and our people will be healthier. We live in an interdependent world. We turn our back on the rest of the world at the expense of our own livers, so to speak.
I argue that you cannot afford to not support other people’s democratic movements. Yes, in the past we have supported the wrong people—the monarchs and facists, but that is no excuse to lay off now that we have an opportunity to support native democratic movements. Hopefully, they will remember their friends, but whether or not they like us, they will have to deal with us if they want their economies to grow. We have the money.
Your feeling that government acts like your father seems to me to be a personal idiosyncrasy. I doubt it is shared by a majority of people, nor even a significant minority. This is not to devalue the feeling, but it makes me think that it has to do more with your personal life than with a political reality.
You are probably healthier than I am. If there were a fat law of some kind, I’d be a beneficiary. Perhaps it would be the incentive I need to finally lose some weight. But I doubt if you are paying for my bills. I have damn good health insurance, which I pay for, and I pay a lot of taxes, so I pay for a lot of health care for the poor and the elderly as well as for the health care for my family. There are not a lot of people in the world who pay for more health care than I do (and very little of it is actually for my own personal benefit). But that’s what the purpose of insurance is. Everyone pays the same and some of us use a lot of care, and others very little. Socialism.