Social Question

SpatzieLover's avatar

Will you eat a test tube hamburger once it's available?

Asked by SpatzieLover (24609points) February 21st, 2012

Test Tube hamburgers

So will you eat one for the sake of science? Or will you refuse due to the science involved?

What are your thoughts on this idea from the link above:
Mass-producing beef, pork, chicken and lamb in the lab could satisfy the growing global demand for meat – forecast to double within the next 40 years – and dramatically reduce the harm that farming does to the environment.

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

28 Answers

gailcalled's avatar

No, never. I haven’t eaten meat in five years and feel better for it.

YoBob's avatar

Well, I might try one just for the novelty. However, I am darned skeptical of the cocktail of hormones and growth agents that are going to have to be used in order to grow commercial quantities in a factory.

Give me good wholesome free range wild harvested venison any day!

Qingu's avatar

If it’s healthy and it tastes good, hell yeah.

I’d much rather eat something that doesn’t come from a suffering living thing.

HungryGuy's avatar

First I’ll wait for all the panics and heath scares pass by. Then, if it’s still on the market, I’ll ask people who are rational and objective and not given in to conspiracy theories what the pros and cons are health-wise. Then I’ll try one and see if it really does taste like hamburger.

WillWorkForChocolate's avatar

Hell no. If I want a hamburger, I want the greasy one smothered in condiments, nestled between a terribly carby bun. If I’m gonna go for it, I don’t want some icky imitation!

6rant6's avatar

Wouldn’t miss it. Can I get one with real cheese to start?

Blackberry's avatar

Yeah sure, as long as it tasted the same, and it was safe.

CWOTUS's avatar

Considering that I’ve eaten sea bugs (lobsters, shrimp and crabs) and things that grow in holes in the ocean floor (clams, mussels and oysters) as well as raw fish and all kinds of land animals (including more or less “acceptable amounts” of insect parts, rodent excrement, bone and stone fragments and just plain dirt that get included in “real” food), I don’t see why not.

gailcalled's avatar

@CWOTUS: I’m probably not going to let you share my toothbrush anytime soon.

WestRiverrat's avatar

Only if it is free range.

PhiNotPi's avatar

Maybe. I may wait a while, but the basic idea seems pretty safe.

But I do have some questions-

Will the meat be relatively fat-free since they are producing muscle cells directly and no fat cells?

Will it be healthier in any way, or will standard hamburger cooking procedures eliminate any benefits?

Will it be easier to prevent food-borne illness such as parasites and other diseases, or will the lack of a cow immune system make any contamination harder to control (even though diseases will hopefully be easier to detect through direct testing)?

How do they separate the meat from whatever chemicals and fluids they are growing it in?

How will the meat be processed and what additives will be added?

How much pollution is created by the factories that will be producing this meat compared to normal farming? (I’m sure the meat will eventually go from test tubes in laboratories to giant vats in factories)

ragingloli's avatar

NO! I want a real one from a real cow that has been enslaved, abused and murdered in the most cruel way possible. It is that suffering that makes it taste so good.~

6rant6's avatar

@PhiNotPi As of now, they have to add fat from another source. It should be healthier in that it wasn’t walking around knee deep in poop, nor standing next to an animal with disease.

Additives? I suppose you get to name your own… chocolate chips, sprinkles, peanuts…

Fly's avatar

Sign me up! Honestly, this seems pretty cool, at least in theory. And if this is the future of meats, I want to be able to say that I’m one of the first to eat it!

ETpro's avatar

I second @Fly. Unless early user reports indicate caution, sign me up for meat without killing cows.

Earthgirl's avatar

Well, it’s better than Soylent Green but I am still not so sure….not a big fan of Frankenfood myself.

SpatzieLover's avatar

No Frankenfood for me either @Earthgirl.

@PhiNotPi I had several of the same questions regarding this that you did. Particularly enviromental impact and what those chemicals and fluids are.

ETpro's avatar

@SpatzieLover Even free range cattle production is not environmentally friendly. And factory farms are terrible environmental actors. An educated guess is this would be far greener than any natural method f producing beef.

6rant6's avatar

@SpatzieLover I don’t know if you’d heard about this… but those cows… full of chemicals.

SpatzieLover's avatar

Not the ones I eat @6rant6.

6rant6's avatar

@SpatzieLover , uh YEah, your cows are full of chemicals. What else do you think they are made of, flux and ether?

Ever heard of rennet?

How about nitrogen, sulfur, phosphate, sodium, manganese, carbolic acid, iron, silicon, chlorine, magnesium, malic, citric, tartaric, succinic acids, calcium salts, Vitamin A, B, C, D, E, minerals, lactose, enzymes, creatinine, hormones and gold acids? Apparently they have so much of these that they excrete it.

Then there are these: ACTH, – Cholesterol, Estrogen, Epinephrine, Heparin, Insulin, Thrombin, TSH and thyroid extracts.

SpatzieLover's avatar

it may be important to note @6rant6 I am from a dairy farming family. Yes, I know what cows are made of. It’s WHY I eat ONLY grass-fed animals that are killed either in the Kosher or Temple Grandin methods

6rant6's avatar

@SpatzieLover Grandin? So you think the cow’s mental health is reflected in the quality of your food?

6rant6's avatar

@SpatzieLover Not pretending to be an expert in Kosher meat. But doesn’t kosher meat processing involve putting meat into brine to draw out the blood? Isn’t that “processing?”

SpatzieLover's avatar

I’ve already explained my thoughts on salt @6rant6. This is not the thread for that. Salt is necessary. Vats of whatever fluid this FrankenBeef is grown in is quite another thing.

Second, Temple Grandin Livestock Handling Methods are the most humane. That is why I prefer it.

So you think the cow’s mental health is reflected in the quality of your food? What?!

6rant6's avatar

@SpatzieLover Grandin’s methods are “the most humane” because they respect the cow’s state of mind leading up to its execution. Hence, “mental health.”

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther