I don’t know whether there is an issue with her objective level of attractiveness. I think the problem is that she chose to talk about it, and in the way she spoke about it, she invited people to judge her, implicitly. Is she as good looking as she says she is? Because if she isn’t, then perhaps her complaints are aimed at the wrong target. Perhaps the reason she is treated the way she is is different from being purely about her looks.
This is not the first time I’ve heard such complaints. Many attractive women get conflicting messages about themselves. They wonder if they are liked for themselves or for their looks. They wonder if their brains are appreciated, or if guys only see their looks. They can have self-esteem problems as a result of good looks, ironically enough.
Another problem is the issue of modesty. Some of us are raised never to toot our own horns. If someone else wants to say we are good at this or that, fine, but we are not supposed to say it of ourselves. And here, she is right, I would guess, that America is different. In America, we are trained, these days, to constantly sell ourselves. For those of us raised to be modest, it is a difficult transition.
Perhaps in England the modesty contingent is more prevalent. If so, I can see that the English reaction would be much stronger than the US reaction. She would seem full of herself in England, but nothing out of the ordinary here in the US.
What interests me is the claims about other women. This is the exemplar of the notorious cattiness of women. I don’t see this cattiness, although I hear a number of women talking about it. Perhaps it is something that women don’t show in front of men. Or perhaps women interpret other women’s comments differently then men do. Women see cattiness where men see something less offensive.
Anyway, I think the response she is getting is probably more because of her attitude and not so much because of the point of story. The problem is, I don’t know if she can make her point without displaying an arrogant attitude.