I do not actually know any teens who do not engage in social networking. My children are 15 and 12. My daughter stays in touch with her friends on Facebook. They all separated from the middle school they attended and are scattered all over the place. She is learning lots of interesting info about their high schools.
Tonight, she was telling us that there is a lot more social pressure at private schools to use drugs and have sex than there is at public schools. Her friends are apparantly facing a lot of pressure. But she does not feel that pressure at the public high school she goes to. She is staunchly anti-drug (despite my efforts to explain that it isn’t necessarily bad; just bad when not used with respect) and anti-alcohol and anti-sex. Sigh. So much for grand children…... just kidding. It’s kind of like having your cake and eating it, too. I can be totally in favor of sexual experiences knowing that she will actually be more likely to remain a virgin until she is 30 or something. Reverse psychology works amazingly well, and they even know all about the theory, and it still works.
My son used google+. One more year before Facebook. He’s not actually pushing all that hard. He does seem to be pushing his grandparents and a few other technophobes into the world of social networking. He posted pictures each day on vacation, and people were very glad to see them, which they could only do if they were on his list and on Google+.
I think that one can get a bit more sophisticated about one’s understanding of teen behavior if you look more deeply than who does or doesn’t use Facebook. As others have pointed out, fluther is social networking, too.
What is more interesting is finding out how kids are using the technology. What kind of content do they produce? Who do they share it with? My son, who doesn’t like to write, has been producing pictures. He photoshops them, as well, and has given me a greater appreciation for the artistry in edited photos. I realize that the reason we edit photos is because we want a kind of idealized truth to show others, and there is nothing wrong with this. We create idealized truths all the time using words or drawings or paintings.
We are used to photos being a kind of accurate record of reality, but now it can be like everything else: an idealized record. Nothing wrong with that. The only problem comes if people think that photos are supposed to be pure truth. They aren’t. Never will be again.
Anyway, my son would put up these photos and then he’d write captions. Those captions told the story, and in doing that, my son was starting to voluntarily do something he claims to hate: write.