A lot of people think that pets are for companionship in this country. I think that is how they measure the way other people treat their pets. I think it is hard for people who think this way to conceive of dogs as being work animals, not pets. I think that once you have a companion pet, it seems like a human, with rights, and to make it work seems like slavery. To treat it in any other way than you would treat your child seems like abuse.
So clearly a lot of people think this guy was abusing his dog by not warning it away from the skunk. He did sort of warn the dog, but not very urgently. I think he truly believed that once the dog got sprayed, it would learn a lesson. I think people here honestly believe that is very close to abusive behavior, if not abusive behavior.
If you treated a child that way, you’d get in trouble with Child Protective Services. Well, I think most of us believe you would. I don’t know that for sure.
Based on that analogy, I think people believe that a pet is very like a child. It is for companionship. So it should be treated about the same as you treat a child. Therefore, the skunk incident is wrong. So they call the owner stupid.
I wouldn’t call the owner stupid. I think he is operating from a different idea about what pets are for. For him, the pet is a rodent killer. It has a job. He needs to train it to know which rodents to go after and which ones to leave alone.
I think part of the problem was his attitude on the tape. He was clearly amused and that is a bullying and cruel attitude. At least, it is when we apply it to children. I don’t know for sure it is when applied to pets. Or dogs. Working dogs. They need leadership. The way most people treat companion dogs, the dog gets the idea that it leads the pack. From what I understand, that is not doing the dog any favors.
This guy was being the leader of the pack for his dog. Who knows if the dog understands his words or demeanor the way we do. I think the guy loved his dog and respected it, even if he was teasing it. It’s a dog. Not a child. It does not speak a language. Humans regularly call dogs awful names in a nice tone of voice. The dog is happy at the attention and the human gets his yayahs out. Win win.
I don’t think the guy was stupid. I don’t think he was cruel. I think he has a very different notion of what a dog is for. I think people here are mostly operating from a different paradigm about pets. I don’t know if you should try to understand other ways of looking at things or not. I mean, this is just a website for people to sound off in. But I would hope that people try to understand where behavior they think is ridiculous is coming from. Once you understand it, then go ahead and condemn it. But condemning things without understanding them seems pointless to me. It’s just rah rah aren’t we beautiful cheerleading behavior. If it isn’t obvious by now, I’ve never been much on cheer leading.