I used to work in education and still work in academia. I can’t tell you how many unintelligent, unimaginative, system-happy, rigid-thinking, tunnelvisioned, paperwork-addicted sheep people exist in these fields. Doesn’t matter where or how good the school supposedly is, the education field is full of people who gravitate to, perpetuate and celebrate the current educational system. The new trend is to add numbers-crunching to all this… sigh.
I loved the job, but hated the system.
I’ve come to see intelligence as a combination of several qualities… the ability:
to see cause-effect and connect the dots,
to see more than one perspective,
to see outside the status quo,
to evaluate and determine best course of action,
to adapt and adjust,
to question and be curious,
to know there are many different types of intelligence, skills and brain power
to know how ones behavior affects others,
to withhold judgment and adjust perspectives when new information comes along,
to explain things in a way that’s accessible to others and
the ability to be introspective. Then there’s the knowledge that they don’t know everything.
Those aren’t measured by any test.
I am very aware of things I’m not as good at as others may be, like time management, standing up for myself, political savvy, focusing… these are proven by results. I can see where my deficits are and where my strengths are—but when it comes to more ambigious skills like the ones I mentioned above, I really believe that if people don’t know these skills exist, they don’t know the immense value of having those skills.
——
About awareness… I used to work for a monthly newspaper and created a yearbook from scratch using InDesign. My yearbook was recommended by the printing company for a competition, but couldn’t be submitted because it wasn’t student-created. My boss at the newspaper company had no idea that the quality of my work was exemplary- he couldn’t see the difference between low and high quality. The same went for my coworkers with the yearbook. Every year, my school puts on a shoddy, poorly run, poorly performed play. Everyone thinks these shows are excellent. They wouldn’t know quality if it fell in their lap and licked their face.
They’re not aware—whether by chance, choice or the inability to ‘get it.’ They think, because they have an extensive vocabulary, credentials, praise, numbers of papers published, position and status etc, that they’re smart. They’re measuring their intelligence by their results, but results are not always proof of intelligence—they’re one way to prove it, but not the only way.
To answer your question, @augustlan, I think it’s both. I think many people are not aware of their lack of intelligence because they have material, man-made and externally-approved things around them to prove their ‘intelligence’ to themselves and others. However, on the other hand, I do think many other people are introspective enough to know where their skills max out and when they need others.
Then there are the blowhards who ride through life taking credit for others’ work and skills… what about these folks?? Do they even know they aren’t doing the work or really think they had something to do with the results?