I don’t know, @Coloma. I think the whole concept of criminal justice is tough because it does elicit a ton of strong emotions. Also, many of us aren’t even on the same page regarding the role of the criminal justice system (punish or rehabilitate). These aren’t easy questions, and I don’t mean to derail this.
But right now, there is a guy who has raped, tortured, and killed someone, and now he’s sitting in jail eating a sandwich. We’re paying for the roof over his head, his food, etc. I can’t stand this, yet I don’t know of a solution that would make me feel better. Would killing him do it? Nope. A) I don’t want to risk one innocent person being put to death, B) I’m an atheist, and death just seems too easy. It’s a “get out of jail free” card, C) I don’t want to give the state that power, and D) It wouldn’t serve as any real justice in my opinion.
But where does that leave me? I could torture him? Nope. A) Again, we have to deal with the possibility of innocence, B) I don’t want to give the state that power, and C) It wouldn’t serve as any real justice in my opinion.
So, I’m left with a desire to keep them out of the general population. This serves to protect us and leaves open the possibility that new evidence arises that will exonerate someone.
Now, if I am excluding people from the general population, I’m also having to care for these people. I have already excluded torture – you may not. I’m not going to assume. It could be argued that withholding health care – physical or emotional – is a form of inhumane or tortuous behavior. If someone has a tremendously-painful physical ailment and we withhold care, I can’t see any way around the fact that this is state-sponsored torture. What about emotional anguish? Mental illness? Depression, etc. This is why I asked where you draw the line. As absurd as it may seem to you and me, is it possible that there is emotional torture with seeing yourself as the opposite gender? This procedure, in my opinion, seems to fit into emotional and physical healthcare.
@Coloma: “Some of the most horrible criminals are having all their needs met by government but we’re blacklisting model citizens because they want a bag of super size fries.”
You already stated that the fries thing is irrelevant to this discussion (@Coloma: “No, I wouldn’t.”), so I’m stumped why you would mention it again.
Regarding this setting a precedent (@Coloma: “I wouldn’t be surprised if some people would commit a crime to get their transgender surgeries for “free” within the system if this goes down.”), I find this scenario completely absurd. And if there is something to it, it says nothing about providing this care to inmates – it speaks to a need for a comprehensive universal healthcare system in this country.