One way, unfortunately, that I am like Romney, is with my dry sense of humor. Without my face to watch as I speak, it can be difficult to get when I am not meaning to be taken seriously.
@Judi Defensive? Could be. One of the reasons I never dated in high school (except maybe once or twice), was because I had no money. So I only ever went out with someone who was willing to go dutch. Those women tended to be women who believed they shouldn’t let men pay for them for eqalitarian reasons. When I went to college, all the women shared the same belief.
The woman I married believes that women should be able to take care of themselves, and she worked through all of our relationship up until this past year. If I ever needed to find another woman, I’d want her to share those same values. For me, equality is very important.
But I truly do believe that traditional values hurt people. This idea that the man is supposed to pay for the woman, and he is in charge of the date causes a lot of problems in relationships, I think. And when people are expecting these traditional roles to be played out, they can’t be themselves, and when they can’t be themselves, they send the wrong information to their date. In a way, it is a kind of lying, although it is socially sanctioned lying.
But you’ve seen all the questions we get here from young women trying to read the signals of their boyfriends. And boys, too, have trouble reading girls. Of course, the young are much more influenced my the myths about how relationships should go. But it isn’t only the young; it is also the middle aged. Maybe even the elderly.
I feel like we, as a society, haven’t learned anything in the past forty years or so. The lessons of feminism seem to be thought of as irrelevant by young women. The politicians are talking about the Lily Ledbetter act and I’m sure most people wonder what the hell that is. Equal pay for equal work? Who needs that? Women are equal already.
If women do not act equal; do not act as if they expect to be equal; can we say they are equal? The personal is political, the feminists said. Well, there are fewer more personal issues than relationship issues, such as dating.
I guess I think that we should all be a bit ashamed about this. I don’t know why because I don’t think shame is helpful, but I feel like we learned these lessons. Hell! This is the battle that was being fought when I was a teen. Why is it still being fought? The only reason I can think of is that there is something stronger than our desire for equality, and that it is somehow in our nature to think that men must lead and women must follow. That’s what this is about, and I just think that is so wrong. But what if it is somehow built into us? Maybe it provides a survival advantage. What would that mean? Does that mean equality is a bad principle? Unworkable? I hope not.