Neither of the two leading candidates will stop using drones if elected. For liberals to sit out this election or vote third party in protest against Obama’s use of them is counterproductive, at best. It will only better the chances of Romney. Idiots. I wouldn’t be surprised if this little idea came from the Romney camp itself.
The fact is, zenvelo above is right. The Pakistani government that our government supports might have control of certain parts of Karachi on a good day and it is a fantasy that they have any control at all outside of the capital city. There are more powerful elements in the Pakistani military, which allow the Pakistani government to exist, that are hostile to the US and can barely put up an amiable diplomatic facade in order to get the billions of dollars in US military and foreign aid. I agree that drones are a good way to deal with cross-border incursions of enemy elements. In this instance. But we will probably see more of this in the future, and this is why:
If this country continues to use its military globally to enforce its interests, it will require more and more ground personnel in localized warfare. This came dangerously close to forcing the US government to enact a military draft in 2003 when it became evident to the US government that the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan were not going to end quickly. But the draft didn’t happen. After much deliberation, they instead lowered the standards of recruitment, established more generous re-enlistment awards and ordered the re-treading of experienced combat soldiers back in-country, which over time plays havoc on military personnel morale. Anything but a draft.
The reason for this is that the government is a good historian. They not-so-fondly remember that every major campus in the US and Canada, and many abroad, were shut down by student protests. One protest interest married and fought with another and, in the summer of 1967, 130 cities burned. The Democratic Convention in Chicago was nearly brought to a standstill by violence and panic on the part of local authorities in the summer of ‘68. It brought the war into our living rooms. Nearly everyone knew of someone who had been killed or wounded in Viet Nam. It gave us spectacles such My Lai, the Kent State Massacre, and the Weathermen. Time Magazine published the names and photos of over 50 young, dead GIs every week. Average age: 19. And this was a small military action compared to Korea and WWII.
This country was torn to shreds during this period and elements in our government have vowed to never let this happen again. With the laws made since, and the rights that have been removed, if the people ever arose like that again, the authorities would be much more brutal this time and America as we know it would certainly not survive. This is why we have drones. And this is why we will continue to make many more, more powerful, much smaller and more efficient ones, and we will use them more, and in a growing number of theaters with increasingly less restrictions.
That is the future. If you don’t like it, HELP MAKE IT AN ISSUE, and change it. But by sitting out this election or voting third party in protest will only make it easier for a Republican to more quickly expand the drone policy.