I don’t remember ever learning anything from a librarian when I was growing up. I remember learning to decode the library mostly on my own. I suspect we did have a lecture or two from a librarian, but the theory never makes sense until you do it yourself.
As a librarian myself, I generally teach students as individuals, instead of in groups. I tell them go here, here, and here on the internet. That’s because I work with specialized collections that regular librarians don’t understand, unless they’ve had the specialized training. But I learned this stuff on my own mostly. I did go to a few conferences where I got some tips, but mostly, I never learn anything until I do it myself.
Should librarians teach people how to do research? I guess, but the kids won’t learn it until they do a research project, and that will have to be under the supervision of the teacher.
The librarian is a consultant. And teachers should teach students how to use consultants—when it is appropriate and what is appropriate to ask them and what isn’t. When I give a lecture, that’s a major part of my lecture.
But I prefer individual consultancies. That way I learn as much from my client as they learn from me. We trade—subject expertise for methodological expertise. It works well for me.
For me, google is the best search engine. If you learn to use google, you can learn to do any kind of search. The specialized searches for academic literature are always frustrating because they don’t work as well as google does. Google will take over the world eventually, if the specialized search engines don’t figure out how to compete.
Google and the internet are our libraries these days. More and more stuff is available over the computer now and in another generation, there will be almost nothing you can’t access over the internet. Traditional library skills will only be needed by specialists who do arcane bibliographic research.
My kids get taken to real book libraries. I’m not sure if they see anything other than books—movies, music, maps, manuscripts, photographic archives, data archives and what not. I seriously doubt they are shown why anyone would be interested in these other kinds of things. It’s just too much. Too overwhelming. A library is overwhelming enough on it’s own.
Understanding that a catalog number is a map that leads you to a location of an item in the collection is cool, and it should be associated with other geographic skills. What are addresses? This is information useful to find houses, books, websites and many other things. I don’t know if most people make the connection between maps, street addresses, card catalogs, IP addresses, phone numbers or any other way of organizing things by physical location. It’s really the same skill with many different applications. But I suspect people think libraries are different than streets or the internet. These things really are all the same in organizational concept.