@JLeslie, what you see, and what you probably aren’t aware of, are two different things in this situation. Back then, it was about the Russians. The Germans had already had the rude awakening they needed – why the hell would they even contemplate attempting the same thing more than twice? Nobody is idealizing anyone here, this was NATO idealizing them in preparation for something that could easily have happened if Russia decided to act on impulse and just say “Sod it, we’ve got the East, let’s spread out some more”. This is why the Brits were always out causing no end of damage to farmland and occasionally parking a tank’s cannon through a pub window (which incidentally, did happen at least once) – and letting guards take pictures of them in front of their tanks arranged as if in some sort of soccer team photo session.
I’m aware of the history, my grandfather served in the second world war, he tells me stories to this day of it and he’s 96.
I’m aware of the implications of the Eastern Western divide in Germany, my Father was there for eight years. So no…I’m not idealizing the Russians they were already idealized for us. Thank the North Atlantic Treaty Organization for that, not me.
The first NATO Secretary General, Lord Ismay, stated in 1949 that the organization’s goal was “to keep the Russians out, the Americans in, and the Germans down.”
I think I rest my case.
The Germans were already down. The Americans were already in, so were the British. As were the French initially but they withdrew in 1966 – leaving the British and the Americans to do the dirty work, because the French probably didn’t want a repeat of the Maginot Line disaster really, where the soviets would pull the same trick as the Reich did, and just go round the bloody thing.
There are probably plenty of Brits who like Irish folk, and plenty of Irish folk who like Brits.
Or are you expecting someone to turn around and say that we’re all hateful little swines who can’t stand Paddy?