@ETpro My real life friends are not the debating type, nor into discussing issues of this magnitude. If the discussion doesn’t involve cars, trucks, motors, hunting, guns, video games, tv shows, girls, etc then it would be a waste to them. In fact I wouldn’t even invite them on here, for they would make me look bad.
I’d be forced to consider users on other online forms that I post on. The problem is that as smart as some of these people are, they seem to be content with their current online residence and show little interest in going elsewhere. Most of them are usually very busy as well and they don’t post regularly even on those forms. I’d even tried to get Ron Pearson, a popular college lecturer, engineer, author, inventor and proparanormal scientist to come on here, but he’s way up in age and too busy battling other scientists over his theories.
@dabbler Yeah that other type of ‘fiery’ has caused me to eliminate accounts on both skeptical and Christian forms. The problem with bringing religion into the picture is that it relies on faith, so it’s very difficult to be tangible. These discussions usually turn into something along the lines of my Savior is the only true one, my religious philosophy is more sound then your religion’s, my God is the only true one, etc. In fact most religious people on here avoid debating because they acknowledge that their faith is just that, faith. The few that do attempt to debate their religion on the grounds of authenticity usually get crushed on here (obvious outcome) and then disappear.
On the other hand discussing paranormal phenomena is a different ballgame, because it is not a topic of religious faith but actual alleged occurances. It is a more tangible subject because the scientific method and empirical data can apply here. I’ve posted many examples of these such as scientific evidence of mediumship, scientific evidence of telepathy, strong physical evidence that near death experiences are likely not hallucinations, evidence where mediums helped police detectives solve dead end cases, etc. This isn’t the thread for discussing these, but fluther acquiring cardiologists, neurosurgeons, physicists, psychologists, etc that agree with me on such controversial topics would make fluther more interesting.
@talljasperman I see that you’re back answering/asking questions again ;-)