I have a completely different take on it, how I’ve come to interpret things reading numerous bibles, but not attending church, I have no dogma to wrestle with.
You won’t hear this in any church or sermon.
So, Jesus said one thing about who he was.
“I am the way, the truth, and the life”... That’s it… That’s all.
He never said he was the son of God. He called himself The Son of Man countless times. Jesus was called the Son of God by everyone else… But he never claimed to be THE actual Son of God any more than one of us could claim to be the Son of Anarchy, or a Child of Hope, or a Daughter of Virtue.
Whether he was or not is irrelevant. The miracles, the virgin birth, the resurrection, ascension… totally irrelevant. They may or may not have happened. It doesn’t matter. That’s the dogma of it all… and the dogma is the pure evil of religion. It not only misses the point… but it actually seeks to divert the point. Dogma is insidious.
The point, was exactly what Jesus said. “I am the way, the truth, and the life”. All that means is to accept the way of truth and live… spiritually live… as in having a spirit of hope, or a spirit of charity, or to be good spirited. I’m not talking about a “heavenly” spirit considered supernatural. I’m talking about a persons real life spirit of how they live in reality.
What does this have to do with Calvary at the Cross?
From a purely materialistic perspective…
The Way of Truth… is a concept freely given to all who would accept it. It cannot be compromised, but it can be rejected. It is freely given, but it must be earned… just like the knowledge of Calculus is free to all, but one must earn it for themselves, to truly come to grips with Calculus, accept it for what it is, and thereby come into union and know the spirit of Isaac Newton. Get it?
Isaac’s “spirit” IS his thoughts. One of many of his thought/spirits, which contribute to the finality of his mind/soul. Get it?
Coming to know Isaac Newton’s thought/spirit of Calculus, requires following his Way.
Of course we could all reject Isaac Newton’s Way of Calculus. That’s the thing about Truth… it can be rejected. But the funny thing about Truth… rejecting it is the very thing necessary for it to be resurrected. It could not be resurrected unless it had been first tested, sometimes butchered, rejected, scorned… like Darwinian Theory.
Only by suffering the fires of persecution, may the final resurrection be honored with the respect it deserves. For amidst our denial, Truth shall eventually prevail through resurrection.
That’s why the previous similar myths of Christendom don’t bother me so much. It’s just a continual resurrection of previous Truths of a compassionate forgiving lifestyle. It will always come again so to speak.
Had Darwin fallen under persecution, I have no doubt the Truths he represented would have been resurrected by another. Had Newton fallen under persecution, I have no doubt the Truths he represented would have been resurrected by another.
The Way I see it.