Social Question

OpryLeigh's avatar

What's your experience of the "I love you but I'm not in love with you" cliche?

Asked by OpryLeigh (25310points) March 30th, 2013

I call it a cliche but the feeling of loving someone and being in love with them are very different.

If someone that you were in a relationship said that to you, could you accept it and continue in the relationship or do you need your partner to feel more.

Have you lost the feeling of being in love with someone yourself? Or never quite got that feeling in the first place for someone you cared strongly for? What did you do about it? Do you need to feel more yourself to continue a romantic relationship?

Please note, I am not talking about a temporary loss of of that in love feeling, all relationships go through blips. I’m talking about that point where you know that no amount of time or effort (counselling etc) will bring it back but you still care for that person. What do you do then?

I hear this said a lot “I love you but I’m no longer in love with you”. My mum said it to my dad, it was her reason for wanting a divorce. She cared for him and claims she will always love him but there was no romantic feelings anymore and she needed more.

What are your thoughts?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

20 Answers

elbanditoroso's avatar

I think it is the first timid step towards breaking up with someone (in your parents case, a divorce, but in a BF/GF situation, the inevitable break-up).

The statement is usually made by someone who doesn’t have the guts to say “I’m through with you”, and who wants to try and soften the blow by mincing their statement with wiggle words. In that respect, it is very similar in effect to “Let’s Just Be Friends” and “It’s not You – It’s me”. Or the famously used “I need a break from the relationship”.

They all add up to the same thing. Cowardice to speak the truth, and some misplaced degree of trying to be nice to the dumpee.

OpryLeigh's avatar

@elbanditoroso So, do you think that not being in love with someone basically means you don’t love them at all even though you may care about their feelings?

elbanditoroso's avatar

There’s a big difference between romantic love (like marriage or significant othership) and having warm and caring feelings.

I care, to a degree, about my ex-wife and how she is faring, and how she is feeling, but there is certainly nothing that approaches romantic love any more.

ucme's avatar

No personal experience & I agree, it’s a cheesy cliche, but it does have merit.
It’s perfectly reasonable to believe that someone can fall out of love with a partner whilst retaining a degree of affection for them. Bonds are hard to break, even though your heart may be telling you otherwise.

OpryLeigh's avatar

@elbanditoroso Thank you for explaining.

filmfann's avatar

People have said this to soften the blow, but I will tell you it doesn’t.

I will add that I once told a girl I loved her, and she asked me not to say that. One month later, she told me she now had the same feelings for me that I had for her, but she wanted to start dating my best friend, also, and would that be a problem?

marinelife's avatar

If that was true for me I would have to get out of the relationship.

whitenoise's avatar

Do you really expect to be ‘in love’ with your SO, all of the time?

I wouldn’t.

‘Being in love’ is much more of a physical, primal thing. Something you can be with someone you barely know. Loving someone is where we can show our human side and reward an intimate bond that has built over time.

And yes… every now and then – quite frequently – I am in love again. Most always with my wife.

hearkat's avatar

Being “in-love” often means the over-hyped rush of infatuation that we often feel when a romantic interest is new. Once the relationship is pursued and we get to know the object of our desire even better, they will show us their human flaws at some point; and the more time spent together, the more they become a regular part of our lives. After even more time, people change, life and time take their toll, and we grow tired and look different. At some point the rush fades, and if the relationship has been built on the false Hollywood fueled expectation of “Happily Ever-After”, a sense of disappointment and even resentment might develop. Sometimes it happens early on, sometimes it is part of a mid-life crisis. True unconditional love outlasts the infatuation phase and never puts expectations on the other person to look a certain way, act a certain way, or to “make me happy”. If someone says they love you but are not in-love with you, that means they like you and care about you, but you don’t live up to their expectations.

My personal experience was in my early 40s, a time when one would think people are matured and have experienced enough real life to not have these issues. I met a guy online and we began dating, and we clicked very well. He got all swept up in the newness and I tried to keep my feet on the ground. I didn’t realize just how recently he had made some big life changes – I thought some had been well over a year prior to our meeting, but I later learned it was all a matter of a few months – so in some ways, I was a rebound and distraction from those old habits and situations. There were bumps and mis-steps along the way, but we’d reconcile. Several months in, we went on a camping trip together. When we returned, he was showing some photos at work, and a colleague of his commented about being surprised that he was with someone overweight, and “he could do better” than me. Shallow asshole had never met me, and knew next to nothing about our relationship, but felt qualified to judge me based on my appearance. Anyhow, after that it never was right again. The ex seemed caught in a cycle of shame: embarrassed to be with someone that looked like me, but ashamed for being embarrassed because he did love me and knew my value as a person. The damage was done, and after a few months he said he loved me but wasn’t attracted to me (another part of the “in-love” expectation for most people).

Through the experience above of not meeting someone’s expectations, and having my love tried and tested in other ways, I realized that I had reached a point in my personal growth that I was able to give love without need or expectations, and that it was foolish to settle for anything less than the same from my partner. I recognize that the experience I had of being judged on my appearance was a necessary test of my own personal development of self-love. Having been molested as a child, I had been full of self-loathing and body image issues for most of my life. By coming out of that relationship with my sense of dignity intact, I knew that I have reached a level of personal integrity I never imagined I’d reached.

I love all my exes, even those that I chose to end the relationship with, as well as the guy I described above. I define Love in two ways: Love (noun) a feeling of deep caring, and Love (verb) actions that put the best interest of the other party first (even when those are difficult or emotionally painful). The relationships I ended were difficult decisions, and what was best for everyone involved – including my son. It wasn’t that I had fallen out of love with them, it was that despite loving them strongly, neither they nor I were emotionally stable enough for us to have a healthy relationship – breaking up was an act of love for all of us to learn and move on. I have no regrets.

zenvelo's avatar

I agree it means the end of the relationship as it was. What happens after depends on the two people, but it won’t be at the same level.

My last relationship it took me a long time to realize she loved me but was not in love with me. We are very close friends, to the point I wanted us to spend the rest of our lives together. Even after years with her I feel better when I am around her. But she really has no romantic feeling for me at all.

So, it may be a common statement, but there is truth to it, and it seems to be a common way that things evolve.

tups's avatar

It is a cliche but it’s not a lie. There’s many kinds of love.
I have someone I care about a lot but I can’t seem to fall in love with them. The heart moves in mysterious ways.

YARNLADY's avatar

It arises from the fact that many words have multiple meanings depending on how they are used, and not only that, every person interprets the words they hear and use in a personal way. To me, your example is trying to say is they still care about the person’s well being, but there is no physical bond.

KNOWITALL's avatar

@ucme said it succinctly.

Love changes, people change, and evolve into something new. It may not be the rush, the sex, the hanging on every word though. For me it’s trust, stability, a safe harbor, humor and understanding each other like no one else does, good and bad. ‘In love’ is good, no doubt about it, but I prefer ‘unconditional love’ any day.

majorrich's avatar

It’s always a giant kick to the nut’s to be relegated to the friend zone. Especially if you have feelings for the friend-zoner. Sometimes, though I knew it was coming, and was more comfortable in the friend-zone. A couple of times it came with Privileges. That made it better, but I knew I had to move on.

OpryLeigh's avatar

@whitenoise I don’t believe that being in love with someone necessarily means that you have those intense feelings at all times but I do think that being in love with someone means you do get those intense “in love” feelings enough to know that the relationship is more than just friendship. In my opinion, if you lose those feelings and you can’t get them back (or they never came in the first place) then you probably aren’t in love. That’s what I meant in this question, I wasn’t referring to the natural flows that relationships go through over time.

@KNOWITALL Do you think you can have both “in love” and unconditional love? I have both for my boyfriend, I trust him with my life and love the friendship that comes with our relationship but I also still have intense physical feelings for him. I’m not sure I could settle for any less than that.

Response moderated (Spam)
whitenoise's avatar

@Leanne1986

Actually, I think I knew what you meant.

That was also what I tried to address… being in love with someone makes you want more out of a relationship than just merely being friends. It plays a big role for you to open up to start a relationship.

However, after those feelings have gone, you may find that the love you feel for your significant other may tell you that the relationship that you have is more than mere friendship as well. The love you then feel, is part of the reason that you stay in.

For me… being in love is all those intense feelings with a possible relationship as a result. Loving someone is the result of that relationship.

Love may be the reason to stay in a relationship, sometimes it may even be a reason to end it. You can have a relationship without being in love, without loving, it becomes hard.

As my grandmother said and as they say, here, where I live…
You marry your partner and if you’re lucky, you’ll learn to love them.

the cliche however, is often just a cheap line used to dump someone. Like “It’s not you… it’s me…”

KNOWITALL's avatar

@Leanne1986 Any time that I have been ‘in love’ it was almost always dramatic and high-emotion, very sexual, and it kind of overwhelm’s you. There is a big difference to me in the calm, unpressured/ objective, unconditional love with a long-term spouse/ marriage/ partnership.

I haven’t seen many examples of long-term, still ‘in love’ with all of these things combined. It almost always get taken down a notch or two by ten years. Of course it’s a big world and anythings possible.

OpryLeigh's avatar

@whitenoise and @KNOWITALL thanks for explaining.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther