Social Question

rojo's avatar

What is a "Radical Sexual Anarchist"?

Asked by rojo (24179points) April 4th, 2013

On the way home from work this evening I heard Kathleen Sebelius,
United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, referred to as a “Radical Sexual Anarchist”.

What in the world is that?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

19 Answers

janbb's avatar

It’s an Obama-Socialist who is a female.

bkcunningham's avatar

I think the reference stems from HHS’s “parenting tips” that referenced children as “sexual beings” and suggested that they should experiment with homosexuality and masturbation. Read this column by Matt Barber.

In part he says, “Make no mistake: Children are the target of what I call the ‘sexual anarchy movement.’ Whether it’s the movement’s pedophile wing that seeks to literally rape children, or its radical pro-abortion, homosexualist and feminist wings, which seek to rape the minds of children, the larger sexual anarchy movement has a shared goal: Attack, corrupt and destroy God’s design for human sexuality. Children are just collateral damage.”

bookish1's avatar

Homosexualism.
We sure love rapin’ children’s wee little minds.
Yup.

elbanditoroso's avatar

I don’t have a clue. But I would LOVE to meet one. Sounds like she would be fun.

Blackberry's avatar

Someone who doesn’t llive their life for the sole purpose of breeding for morally superior american christians?

ETpro's avatar

@bkcunningham I would like to see better documentation of the rather outrageous sounding claim that HHS recommended any such thing. That right-wing online magazine posts a link that tries to point to “Faux Noise” as “proof” of their claim, and we all know what an unimpeachable source Fox is. But instead of leading to a Fox article citing sources, the link actually leads to “Server Error in ’/Columnists’ Application.”

I’m feeling another case of Drudge fakeusitis coming on.

@rojo I’d say the term refers to those who advocate pure libertarianism for sexual laws and mores. A sexual anarchist would do away with laws against bestiality, polygamy, incest, maybe even pedophilia… I suppose it would depend on how raving anarchist the individual was whether they would extend that liberty to the right to rape, etc. Even some anarchists are willing to draw a line at use of force against others, but some are not. True anarchists tend to be those that think if we just converted our country to follow a model that really works well, like that of Somalia, they would end up the biggest, baddest warlord and they’d take whatever they want.

Interestingly, the news flash that @bkcunningham cited above came from that right wing writer’s attendance at a convention of self-avowed pedophiles. One might ask what he was doing there. Apparently it was not taking names and numbers so the police could check which of the collected cranks were actually acting on their perverted desires, but rather he was there looking for ways he could draw connections between this wildly off-beat group and his political enemies, whether such connections actually exist or not.

Berserker's avatar

Sounds like a name for an Industrial band.

whitenoise's avatar

It is a term used by right wing extremist nut cases as the one referred to above, by @bkcunningham.

They use it to frame people they politically not agree with.

whitenoise's avatar

I just realized that “right wing extremist nut cases” is a serious tautology. Sorry for that.

Berserker's avatar

Yeah, I was pretty much just laughing my ass off there. :p

bookish1's avatar

@ETpro: Even some [sic] anarchists are willing to draw a line at use of force against others, but some are not. True anarchists tend to be those that think if we just converted our country to follow a model that really works well, like that of Somalia, they would end up the biggest, baddest warlord and they’d take whatever they want.

Citation, dude?
You are painting all anarchists with a very, very, very broad brush. I would assert that the majority of anarchists are not violent. But it’s much easier to assume that all anarchists are bomb-throwing maniacs. Because it has suited the state to reduce them to this image since the turn of the 20th century.
None of the many anarchists I have met so far has wanted to be a warlord. I have met some who are pretty much bodhisattvas.
What in blazes?

bookish1's avatar

@bkcunningham: I sincerely would like to look at the sources for that article. I am open to having my opinion changed of Alfred Kinsey if it turns out that he did indeed perform experiments on children, or advocate relationships with them. I’d also like to see GLSEN’s recommended reading list for children for myself, or read HHS’s list of parenting tips. But not a single one of those links works…

Don’t mean this as an ad hominem against you. But the lack of sources makes me inclined to think the author of that article is a joke. If I were to submit a paper all of whose citations were to nonexistent books…I would get kicked out of grad school for that, on the first infringement, no questions asked…

bkcunningham's avatar

I was answering the original question with the post. Right, wrong or indifferent; I answered the question. I’m curious about what exactly @rojo was listening to on the radio.

If you want to see the sources of the claims in the link I provided, you can go here and read through the various links.

As to the Kinsey Institute, @bookish1, it has been an ongoing controversy that focuses on data presented in Tables 31 through 34 in the Male volume, reporting various aspects of orgasm observed in pre-adolescent boys ranging in age from 2 months to 15 years.

This is one of many qualified discussions about the subject. Quoting from the link:

Having commented on the extent to which adults had recalled orgasmic experiences from their own childhoods, Kinsey pointed out that such recall might well be vague or inaccurate, particularly of an experience which the child may not have understood at the time. He was, therefore, especially interested in information obtained from those of his interviewees who had observed orgasms occurring in children.

Whereas he had some information of this kind from parents and teachers simply observing children, he obtained more from men who had been sexually involved with young boys and who had in the process observed their orgasms. Having therefore made it clear that he was referring to adults who had been involved in illegal sexual interactions with children, he went on to say, “nine of our adult male subjects have observed such orgasm. Some of these adults are technically trained persons who have kept diaries or other records which they have put at our disposal; and from them we have secured information on 317 pre-adolescents who were either observed in self-masturbation, or were observed in contacts with other boys or older adults.” 50

Tables 31–34 are based on these 317 boys; Table 32 gives details of the speed of orgasm (timed with a second hand or stopwatch), whereas Tables 33 and 34 give details about multiple orgasms. Thus, an understandable concern was raised: How could such information be obtained in a sufficiently systematic manner to allow tabulation of the findings? Hence the allegations that either Kinsey or members of the Institute staff made these observations, or that they trained child molesters to make observations for them.

Source of Data in Tables 31–34

I decided to check on the sources of this information and found that, without any doubt, all of the information reported in Tables 31–34 came from the carefully documented records of one man. From 1917 until the time that Kinsey interviewed him in the mid-1940s, this man had kept notes on a vast array of sexual experiences, involving not only children but adults of both sexes.

Kinsey was clearly impressed by the systematic way he kept his records, and regarded them as of considerable scientific interest. Clearly, his description in the book of the source of this data was misleading, in that he implied that it had come from several men rather than one, although it is likely that information elsewhere in this chapter, on the descriptions of different types of orgasm, was obtained in part from some of these other nine men.

I do not know why Kinsey was unclear on this point; it was obviously not to conceal the origin of the information from criminal sexual involvement with children, because that was already quite clear. Maybe it was to conceal the single source, which otherwise might have attracted attention to this one man with possible demands for his identification (demands which have now occurred even though he is long dead). It would be typical of Kinsey to be more concerned about protecting the anonymity of his research subjects (and convincing the reader of the scientific value of the information) than protecting himself from the allegations that eventually followed.

bkcunningham's avatar

Here is the GLSEN reading list.

rojo's avatar

@bkcunningham I am sorry, I cannot tell you what I the program was on the radio. I have a tendency to flip back and forth between two different public access channels, an “oldies” channel, a right wing AM radio channel and some christian channel (I try to cover a wide spectrum). It was after 5 so it could have been any of the news shows. From the tone of the message, I would assume it was the christian channel but, again, that is just my assumption.

bkcunningham's avatar

That’s okay, @rojo. I just wondered if you could remember. I’m sure it wasn’t a Progressive station.

bkcunningham's avatar

Also, I hope I answered your question. I wasn’t trying to argue the point, just answer your question. What I linked originally would be my guess as to where the term originated.

bookish1's avatar

@bkcunningham : Thank you for providing those links. I appreciate it. I read the defense of Kinsey and it was very interesting. I had no idea of those accusations.

ETpro's avatar

@bookish1 Sorry about being so late back to this. I had a huge crunch project yesterday where a client waited till late in the day to let me know he needed a job finished immediately to coincide with a major advertising campaign. I worked till 3:15 AM on it. I don’t know had sexual anarchy differs from anarchy in general. Perhaps it does. I was answering based on my understanding of what anarchists in general believe.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther