Social Question

tom_g's avatar

What if people had visible stats?

Asked by tom_g (16638points) April 9th, 2013

This is one of those “what if” questions that I usually avoid, so I feel strange asking it.

This question was inspired by a casual conversation I had a few years ago with a friend. I wondered how different things would be if every human had an expiration date on their forehead, that was guaranteed to be accurate? Would this have and an effect on how people treated each other? What if the person behind you in line at the market only had 2 days left? What if that screaming little 5 year old in the coffee shop having a tantrum only had 5 more years left, and would die of leukemia? It was an interesting thought experiment, and led me to the conclusion that I would likely treat people very differently if I knew when they were going to die. This is an uncomfortable realization to have, and I suspect many of us would likely act differently as well. But why? We already know that every stranger (of every age) we meet today will die. We know that many of them will die well before they reach the average life span.

Anyway, that is not really my question – although feel free to comment on that as well if you want. Inspired by that ridiculous expiration date thing, I was wondering how we would treat people if there were other visible stats on people. Say, for example, that loneliness could be measured on a scale of 1 to 10. 1 being the least amount of loneliness available for a human to experience, and 10 being the most amount of loneliness a human could experience. Let’s say we could see these stats when we looked at people…
– loneliness
– amount of current physical pain
– physical trauma experienced in the past
– emotional trauma experienced in the past
– confusion
– feelings of loss
etc…

How would those stats color our interactions with people we met?

Observing members: 0 Composing members: 0

7 Answers

Judi's avatar

It would be important for the information to also emanate from their car as well. I’m pretty good at treating people with dignity until I get behind the wheel. Something happens to me that makes me see every driving indiscretion a sign of utter incompetence and as my husband would say, “bad breeding.”
I’m working on it.

thorninmud's avatar

I think we do have something very much like this, but it takes a whole lot of sensitivity to “read” the stats. Our social brains can be incredibly good at picking up on subtle visual clues to another person’s state, often without ever knowing exactly what we’re keying into. My Zen teacher was very good at this, far better than I am.

Not long ago, A woman showed up at our temple and told me that my teacher had given a guest talk at her church. Afterward, he had come up to her and said, “I can see that you’re going through a hard time. Here’s the phone number of the temple if you feel like you want to talk about it.” So there she was.

This wasn’t psychic. It was just the kind of sensitivity that can operate when you’re not too self-absorbed to really see the person in front of you.

There’s a saying that at 40 we all have the face we deserve. There’s something to that. Life experience writes on our faces and bodies in a script that we’re wired to read, but that requires an uncommon inner quiet.

Dr_Lawrence's avatar

I believe if most people were concerned about how others feel and what troubles they had experienced, our civilization would be so much more humane. What we need is more people who care rather than visible stats. Until people really care about the experiences and burdens of others, I believe little will change.

tom_g's avatar

@Dr_Lawrence: “What we need is more people who care rather than visible stats.”

I’m not advocating for some future where stats are visible. Rather, I’m wondering if the lack of caring you describe would disappear (or change) if we were able to actually see people, as @thorninmud describes. Is it that we lack empathy and compassion, or is it that we operate in a delusional or blind state? I don’t know the answer, but I suspect that the blinders that keep us from actually seeing people might be what keeps us from truly meeting and reaching out to people as people. I am as guilty as the rest of us. We rush around and feel that everyone is an extra in our little play. They are things that are in our way.

augustlan's avatar

This reminds me of a video I saw a while back (which I can’t find now, of course). It showed a deli and its surrounding area filled with random people. All of the people looked fine (or at least not bad) on the outside, but each person had a little blurb above his head, revealing what troubles they were dealing with:

just lost her job
has cancer
his wife recently died
is in an abusive relationship and doesn’t know what to do
worried about his elderly mother

…and so on. It was meant to encourage compassion for others, and it was a good reminder to me. The quote “Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a hard battle” pops up on my Facebook feed every now and again, and reminds me anew.

It’s sad that we need reminding at all, but it’s so easy to get all caught up in our own traumas and dramas. If we were constantly exposed to visible stats, I wonder if we’d eventually become inured to them and go right back to being self absorbed. I think we just might. :(

Judi's avatar

@augustlan, I think it might have been a United Church of Christ or a Methodist ad.

augustlan's avatar

@Judi Yes, that sounds right.

Answer this question

Login

or

Join

to answer.
Your answer will be saved while you login or join.

Have a question? Ask Fluther!

What do you know more about?
or
Knowledge Networking @ Fluther