@Dutchess_III I was more interested in dealing with the fact that the premise of this question is based upon a strawman rather than trying to explain my position on each of these subjects, which of course would be nothing short of typing my own version of an encyclopedia. I’d rather reserve debating the validity of my position of a single topic on a thread devoted to that topic, not here.
You’ve misrepresnted my position as well as the reasons for coming to my opinions, but many other skeptics have done this too so you’re not alone in that department. First off I’d never said that I wanted to believe that bigfoot was real, nor did I even give my personal opinion about it. Other skeptics (not all but many) have misrespresented my position on other topics as well such as making assumptions about my personal feelings about a topic based upon my stance.
In fact I hear this all of the time when I attempt to debate the validity of afterlife evidence, that I have come to my stance of this topic due to wishful thinking, religious upbringing, culture, lack of critical thinking ability and so on. I’ve come to my position because I’ve actually spent the last 10+ years researching, and posting the very evidence which I repeatedly hear skeptics claim doesn’t exist, not because of wishful thinking. In fact I’m not sure I’m very fond of the concept of an afterlife and I even debated a Spiritualist philosopher about the possible negative consequences of the mind surviving physical brain death. I’m obviously no religionist either so that type of bias is ruled out too, and I actually consider myself to be a secular individual (as odd as that may sound).
I’ll throw in quick opinion since you’ve brought the topic of bigfoot up though. I have not done enough research on bigfoot, yeti, etc to post any viable opinion here. I’m very skeptical about such a creature existing as I was with Nessie, but still open to the possibility. I’m probably much more skeptical about the existence of Nessie than I am bigfoot, but I’ve done much more research about this alleged Loch Ness Monster than I’ve done with bigfoot. However even this discussion doesn’t fall under the category of conspiracy theories, so maybe you can see why this question struck me as more of a why do people believe in wierd things like aliens, god, ghosts, etc rather than a question truly directed at conspiracy theorists.
@antimatter These types of questions along with the typical fluther responses are a prime reason why (even when I was a skeptic myself) I never identified with the skeptical movement or mindset. In fact there are several reasons why I find many in the modern skeptical movement who are flawed with their way of thinking, including the widely held belief that the scientific method is the only tool we can use to have true knowledge of anything, and that they speak in the name of science, and that the ‘real’ science they claim they stand for itself doesn’t comprise of politics, profits incentives, reputations at stake and other special interests.
I’ll go with skeptics Truzzi’s and Bond’s take on this and simply refer to myself as a skeptical seeker rather than a ‘skeptic’ with the modern day skeptical mindset. Today the term skeptic usually means psuedoskeptic or obstructionist, and the term skeptical seeker means what the term skeptic used to mean in the nineteenth century, at least to me anyways.