This really doesn’t offend me. If someone’s served his time and is struggling to return to society, should he starve?
Some years ago, I was involved in a “transitional housing” charity. The organization, which owned a small apartment building, intended to move homeless families to self-sufficiency. Unfortunately, the charity was run by a bunch of wealthy people who truly believed that “homeless” is the same as “houseless.” The maximum stay in an apartment was 1 year. The idea was that the organization could take someone off the streets, put a roof over his/her head for 12 months, and watch him/her magically join the middle class.
Of course, the charity was a dismal failure. The reasons for homelessness are complex—alcoholism, addiction, ignorance, mental illness, absent fathers, the fact that nobody in the U.S. can pay rent and support a family on minimum wage, etc.—and can’t be fixed by simplistic means. All the charity did was warehouse people briefly and return them to the streets.
Unless an ex-con had been middle-class or upper-class before his sentence, and unless his incarceration was brief, the story’s pretty much the same for someone leaving prison. Institutionalization is the antithesis of independence. Inmates become so conditioned to and dependent on institutional life, it’s unrealistic to believe that they can walk out the door and become productive members of society.
They need job training, counseling, and halfway houses where they can learn how to hold jobs and live within a community. Of course, the fabulous U.S., which is so good at tossing people into prison, doesn’t provide any such support. If all an ex-con can get is food stamps, please pass the hat and I’ll gladly chip in. Without any help at all, he’ll soon be back in prison.