Besides a circle, is there any other shape that can rotate within a triangle?
Asked by
PhiNotPi (
12686)
May 30th, 2013
If I were to have a square, it is obvious that a circle can rotate within it, which means that the circle can make a 360° rotation inside of the square while always touching the four sides of the square. There are, however, other shapes that can do this, such as the Reuleaux triangle. These shapes are called curves of constant width. Each one of this shapes, dispite being non-circular, can rotate within a square without losing contact on any of the sides.
My question involves an equilateral triangle instead of a square. It is also clear that a circle can rotate within an equilateral triangle without losing contact on any sides, but are there any other shapes that can do this?
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
7 Answers
Some sort of hexagonal shape with enough sides would, but aside from that I don’t think so. However some sides would loose contact, so if that is a requirement I would say no, there is nothing aside from a circle.
This Wikipedia article claims that such curves exist (scroll down to Generalizations), but the article link does not work.
Maybe the best approach would be to start with a simpler problem. Can we find a curve that stays in constant contact with two lines that form a 60 degree angle?
A three sided pyramid, and a sphere.
@XOIIO To clarify, the shape must not lose contact with the three sides of the triangle. It wouldn’t matter if one of the hexagon’s sides does not touch the triangle, but it would matter if one side of the triangle loses contact with the hexagon.
@PhiNotPi Ah, well then something like a 30 or more sided hexagon would work, you just need enough sides to that it would essentially be a rough circle.
A simple lens shape would do it.
I don’t think there’s any plolygons, but some amorphous shapes might.
Answer this question
This question is in the General Section. Responses must be helpful and on-topic.