It’s interesting because I believe there was a question asked in the past about what exactly constitutes “mocking”. We all believe certain things are ridiculous. I believe that it’s ridiculous to claim that the Jews are behind all of the world’s evil in some massive Zionist conspiracy (yes, there are people who believe this). I believe it’s ridiculous to think that a certain race can be superior to another based on nothing other than their skin color. These are all ridiculous beliefs and ideas and are potentially dangerous to society, so of course I will call them out as such.
But, as some people have pointed out, it seems that no one can call out religious beliefs for being the same way. Now, I’d say it depends on the belief. If it’s your belief that all non-believers in your religion should be killed or at the least forcibly converted, I’m sorry, but I think that’s a ridiculous belief. But that one is in a more obvious state. Other times, the line between what we can call a “ridiculous belief” and what we should just leave alone is more subtle.
Think about it this way: as an atheist, I don’t believe that your deity exists. I don’t believe that you are actually reaching anything metaphysical when you pray. I don’t believe that your actions are actually being done in the name of a deity. Now, when worded that way, doesn’t it sound a little, well…harsh? I don’t have to be an atheist either, I could simply be a Hindu and don’t believe in any deities other than the Hindu deities. So could a Christian or Jew say the same thing to a Hindu or a traditional Native American religion. As an atheist, I believe that your deity is as non-existent as any other non-existent entity, whatever that may be. Can you see how this comes so close to “YOUR GOD IS SANTA CLAUS LOLZORS!”. Fine, fine line. But this is the just harsh reality of having differing beliefs from someone, and I think this is where some of the “mocking” comes from, crossing these fine lines.
I have met Christians who think atheism is absolutely insane. “How could you not believe in God when the evidence is all around you? Atheists are truly nuts. They choose to ignore all the evidence, they are willfully ignorant, they are arrogant fools who think humans are the ultimate power and they don’t want to have to answer for their actions.” See how the same type of attitude that some of these “hard-core atheists” have can be mirrored in theists. It may not happen on crazy liberal Fluther, but it happens. Not saying that excuses atheists doing that, but it is possible to picture it from your side.
Another issue is the fact a belief or an opinion does not automatically deserve respect by the nature of it being a belief or an opinion. What exactly does it mean to “respect a belief”? To not mock it? Seems easy enough. To acknowledge that it’s just as valid as any other belief? That’s where it gets tricky. The fact is: I don’t respect the belief that I am somehow debased because I am a homosexual. I don’t believe that that belief is worthy of my personal respect. Will I openly mock someone for it? No. But will I respect it? Also no. If respect means more than just not mocking something. If not, well, then I guess I do respect it.
But the fact is: most of the time, mocking is obvious. At least to me. Challenging someone’s assertion that the earth is 6000 years old can be done without saying “you’re an idiot for believing that”. Arguing against a certain claim by citing a Bible verse can be done without “you’re a fool for not seeing it”. To question, ask for evidence, criticize—these can all be done without mocking, although sometimes the line is fine.
Anyway, this all over the place, but just thought I’d throw something in.