What are your thoughts about the delay announced yesterday regarding ObamaCare to not impose a penalty until 2015 on businesses that don't insure?
Asked by
JLeslie (
65746)
July 3rd, 2013
Here is an article.
I don’t like requiring businesses to do anything with healthcare insurance or coverage. I don’t like the marriage of employers and health care coverage in general.
What are the reasons for the delay? I am unclear about why this decision was made.
Observing members:
0
Composing members:
0
9 Answers
Typical, business gets the breaks. And, only businesses with over 50 employees I believe.
Maybe this is the first step in a single-payer universal health care plan. Not sure how but I can hope can’t I?
I really don’t care that much about the delay. I don’t think it will have much of an impact. It’s just on the fine for non compliance.
The important thing is that insurance will be more portable and more affordable. Single payer would be better but this is better than the NO insurance so many Americans deal with.
It delays this until after the election. Any negative impact won’t show up until the election cycle has passed. Another political move.
As usual @Jaxk is correct. Right on in this case.
Yes, @Jaxk is correct. Obama’s actions gets us through the midterm elections without anyone facing any consequences of the divisive law.
Obama has been cowed by big business. He should have taken this to the wall, but he’s weak. The right thing to do would have been to wait and let the owner’s of Denny’s restaurants and the others who have come out and blatantly said that they would not cooperate by hiring only part-time staff (thereby exacerbating the homeless problem in the US), and then nail them with the maximum penalty in televised show trials. Fuck these guys. An fuck ‘em good.
Answer this question