@jerv, thanks for the encapsulation.
Just to follow one line of thought: let’s take a pharmacist who doesn’t believe people should practice birth control and therefore refuses to dispense birth control pills. (This is not a made-up example.)
Suppose that that pharmacist, instead of declining to fill a prescription, decides to fill it with something other than the prescribed med?
This part is just hypothetical, now. Let’s just follow it through.
Instead of supplying the contraceptive, let’s imagine that he provides something with another active ingredient or no active ingredient—a placebo—so that the customer doesn’t know she has to go elsewhere for her prescription. Instead she believes that she is protected against pregnancy, but she isn’t.
Now suppose that a pharmacist who feels justified in making such moral judgments—and acting upon them—subscribes to a belief about who is or is not fit to live. It’s her religion, and who can argue with that? So she gives placebos to people with certain diseases (who ought not to live anyway, since obviously it’s God’s will that they should die, or they wouldn’t have the disease), or people of certain races, or people who wear certain symbols on their clothing.
How is her decision to impose her morality on unwitting patients substantially different from those of people who use legislation to accomplish the same end?
And how far is it from there to taking her convictions out of the pharmacy and onto the street or into the neighborhood, the schoolroom, the seat of government?
Now let’s say that patients who use a certain pharmacy start dying off—or having babies—in unprecedented numbers, and authorities make the connection. The perpetrator is arrested and prosecuted. Is this a person who should be admired, and possibly exonerated, for standing up for her faith and becoming a willing sacrifice to her belief? To what lengths do we go to tolerate her extreme behavior?
Oh, we require her to stop where the law kicks in to protect the rights of those patients? Is that where the line is? What if the law in her state was made by people who believe as she does?
Anyone who claims to know the will of God and to act on it scares me, even if they are half a world away and what they’re doing has no conceivable effect on my life. To think there’s no possible connection is simply a delusion.
On September 10, 2001, how many people in New York thought their lives were affected by the beliefs of a bunch of extremists in the Middle East?
It’s one thing to be a martyr to one’s own beliefs; it’s another to be a martyr to someone else’s.